civil-litigation discovery court-watch

Magistrate Judge Hanna grants unopposed protective order motion

Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Hanna granted the unopposed motion for a protective order by defendants Broyles, Fitz, and Treanor on July 2, 2025. The court ordered the proposed protective order to be entered following the text order.

Latest development

TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Ronald L Hanna on 7/2/2025. Defendants Broyles, Fitz, and Treanor's Motion for Protective Order 20 is GRANTED as unopposed. The proposed protective order attached to the motion is

Order · May 11, 2026

A Motion was filed.

Key Issues

  • Protective order motion
  • Unopposed motion
  • Confidentiality protections
  • Magistrate judge ruling
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Ronald L Hanna on 7/2/2025. Defendants Broyles, Fitz, and Treanor's Motion for

Order · May 11, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

Parties not parsed yet

0 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.

Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 2 days, 20 hours ago

Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Hanna granted the defendants’ motion for a protective order on July 2, 2025. Defendants Broyles, Fitz, and Treanor filed the motion, which went unopposed.

The court approved the protective order as submitted with the motion and ordered it entered immediately following the text order. The case remains active, but the docket and court details have not been publicly disclosed.

The protective order likely limits the scope of discovery or restricts the use of sensitive information, but the specifics have not been made available. No judge has been assigned to oversee the case beyond the magistrate’s involvement.

The next significant development will depend on further filings or motions, as the case appears to be in an early procedural stage. The defendants’ unopposed motion suggests the plaintiffs have not challenged the protective order, which may streamline discovery or other pretrial processes.

Watch for any subsequent motions or orders that clarify the case’s subject matter or identify the presiding district judge.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 2 days ago
A Motion was filed.
receipt_long Source expand_more

TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Ronald L Hanna on 7/2/2025. Defendants Broyles, Fitz, and Treanor's Motion for Protective Order 20 is GRANTED as unopposed. The proposed protective order attached to the motion is to enter following entry of this text order. (KE)

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order May 11, 2026

TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Ronald L Hanna on 7/2/2025. Defendants Broyles, Fitz, and Treanor's Motion for Protective Order 20 is GRANTED as unopposed. The proposed protective order attached to the motion is to enter following entry of this text order. (KE)

A Motion was filed.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 day, 19 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.