Case proceeds before magistrate judge under General Order 26-05 consent

description

Case Summary

The case has been fully consented to proceed before a magistrate judge under General Order 26-05. No further documents or filings are associated with this entry as of April 28, 2026.

Latest development

This action has been fully consented to according to General Order 26-05. The case will proceed before a magistrate judge. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tsn) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 04/28/2026)

Order · May 11, 2026

The court issued an order.

Key Issues

• • Consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction
• • General Order 26-05 compliance

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

This action has been fully consented to according to General Order 26-05. The case will proceed before a magistrate

Order · May 11, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

Parties not parsed yet

0 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.

Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 1 day, 23 hours ago

The case has been fully consented to under General Order 26-05, meaning all parties agreed to proceed before a magistrate judge instead of a district judge. The court has not yet assigned a specific magistrate judge to oversee the matter.

The docket lacks a PDF filing or detailed public documents, limiting available information on the claims or parties involved. The case remains active as of the latest docket entry on April 28, 2026. On May 11, 2026, the court issued an order, but the content of that order is not publicly available.

Without more filings or a judge assignment, the case is in an early procedural stage focused on magistrate judge jurisdiction. Watch for the assignment of a magistrate judge and subsequent scheduling orders, which will clarify the case's direction and timeline.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event

gavel

Order 1 day ago

The court issued an order.

receipt_long Source expand_more

This action has been fully consented to according to General Order 26-05. The case will proceed before a magistrate judge. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tsn) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 04/28/2026)

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Case Timeline

1 event

gavel

Order May 11, 2026

This action has been fully consented to according to General Order 26-05. The case will proceed before a magistrate judge. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tsn) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 04/28/2026)

The court issued an order.