Magistrate Judge Pesto Grants Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Sherif Bishara
Case Summary
Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto granted a motion for Attorney Sherif Bishara to appear pro hac vice on February 26, 2026. The order was entered as a text-only entry without a PDF.
Latest development
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Attorney Sherif Bishara to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto on 2/26/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order
Order · May 11, 2026
Judge Keith granted Motion for Attorney Sherif Bishara to Appear Pro Hac Vice.
Key Issues
- • Pro hac vice admission
- • Attorney appearance
- • Court order
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Attorney Sherif Bishara to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto
Order · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Presiding Judge
1 linked entity
Judge
Keith A. Pesto
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Keith A. Pesto.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto granted a motion allowing attorney Sherif Bishara to appear pro hac vice in this case on February 26, 2026. The order was entered as a text-only docket entry and no accompanying PDF was issued.
This procedural step permits Bishara, who is not admitted to the court’s bar, to represent a party in this matter temporarily. The case remains active, but details about the underlying dispute, parties involved, and court location have not been disclosed in the docket.
The pro hac vice admission indicates that the case may involve out-of-state counsel or specialized legal expertise not available locally. This order does not address substantive issues or motions beyond the admission of counsel. The court’s docket has not yet reflected further filings or rulings following this order.
The judge’s decision to grant the motion suggests no procedural barriers to Bishara’s participation, but it does not imply any ruling on the merits of the case. Practitioners tracking this matter should note that the admission of out-of-state counsel often precedes more substantive motions or hearings.
The absence of a PDF order suggests the court is handling this as a routine administrative matter. The docket number and court name remain unspecified, limiting public insight into the case’s context or claims. The next steps will likely involve filings by counsel now admitted, which could clarify the dispute’s nature and procedural posture.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Attorney Sherif Bishara to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto on 2/26/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bgs) (Entered: 02/26/2026)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventORDER granting 2 Motion for Attorney Sherif Bishara to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto on 2/26/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bgs) (Entered: 02/26/2026)
Judge Keith granted Motion for Attorney Sherif Bishara to Appear Pro Hac Vice.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
10 hours, 59 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.