Judge Mihm grants unopposed motions to dismiss all claims without prejudice
Case Summary
Judge Michael M. Mihm granted unopposed motions to dismiss filed by defendants Broyles, Fitz, Treanor, and Gadson on July 15, 2025. The court dismissed all claims without prejudice and ordered the clerk to enter judgment accordingly.
Latest development
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 7/15/2025. Defendants Broyles, Fitz, and Treanor's Motion to Dismiss 21 is GRANTED as unopposed. Separately, Defendant Gadson's Motion to Dismiss 22 is GRANTED as
Order · May 11, 2026
A Motion was filed.
Key Issues
- • Unopposed motions to dismiss
- • Dismissal without prejudice
- • Multiple defendants
- • Entry of judgment
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 7/15/2025. Defendants Broyles, Fitz, and Treanor's Motion to Dismiss 21
Order · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Presiding Judge
1 linked entity
Judge
Michael M. Mihm
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Michael M. Mihm.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Judge Michael M. Mihm granted unopposed motions to dismiss filed by Defendants Broyles, Fitz, Treanor, and Gadson on July 15, 2025. The court approved Broyles, Fitz, and Treanor's Motion to Dismiss at docket entry 21 and Gadson's Motion to Dismiss at docket entry 22.
The dismissal applies to all claims against all defendants. The judge ordered dismissal without prejudice, allowing the plaintiff to refile the claims if desired. The clerk was directed to enter judgment reflecting the dismissal.
No opposition was filed against the motions, which likely influenced the court's decision to grant dismissal without prejudice. The case remains active but currently lacks any live claims against the defendants. The docket number and court are not publicly available, limiting further procedural details.
The status suggests the plaintiff may consider amending or refiling claims, given the dismissal without prejudice. The case's next steps depend on whether the plaintiff chooses to pursue further action or let the matter close with the entered judgment.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 7/15/2025. Defendants Broyles, Fitz, and Treanor's Motion to Dismiss 21 is GRANTED as unopposed. Separately, Defendant Gadson's Motion to Dismiss 22 is GRANTED as unopposed. The claims against all Defendants have been dismissed. The Court finds dismissal without prejudice appropriate given all dismissal motions have been granted as unopposed. Clerk is to enter judgment. (VH)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventTEXT ORDER entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 7/15/2025. Defendants Broyles, Fitz, and Treanor's Motion to Dismiss 21 is GRANTED as unopposed. Separately, Defendant Gadson's Motion to Dismiss 22 is GRANTED as unopposed. The claims against all Defendants have been dismissed. The Court finds dismissal without prejudice
A Motion was filed.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
7 hours, 48 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.