Consent motion filed for agreed briefing schedule in civil case

Gloria Turnage submitted a consent motion on December 19, 2025, asking the court to enter an agreed order establishing a briefing schedule. The motion includes a proposed order outlining deadlines for the parties to file briefs. The case remains active but has not been assigned to a judge yet.

The court docket number and the presiding court have not been disclosed.

This procedural step suggests the parties have reached some agreement on how to proceed with briefing key issues in the case. The agreed schedule will set the timeline for written submissions, which typically precede motions or dispositive rulings. The filing indicates cooperation between the parties on managing the case’s next phase.

The lack of a judge assignment means the case is still in early stages, likely before substantive rulings. The briefing schedule will help the court and parties organize upcoming arguments or motions. Without more details on the underlying dispute, the motion’s focus is purely procedural.

The docket remains sparse, with no other filings or hearings reported. The court’s decision on this motion will clarify the timeline for the case’s next steps. Once the order is entered, the parties must adhere to the deadlines for their briefs.

This motion signals movement toward resolving contested issues through written submissions. It also reflects a coordinated approach to case management before the court takes up substantive matters.