Judge Mihm grants Kripakaran dismissal and extends time for other defendants
Case Summary
Judge Michael M. Mihm granted defendant Kripakaran's unopposed motion to dismiss on June 10, 2025, and ordered the clerk to terminate Kripakaran from the case. The court also granted an unopposed extension of time for defendants Broyles, Fitz, and Treanor to file responsive pleadings, now due June 26, 2025.
Latest development
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 6/10/2025. Defendant Kripakaran's Motion to Dismiss 17 is GRANTED as unopposed. Clerk to terminate Defendant Kripakaran. Separately, Defendants Broyles, Fitz, and Treanor's
Order · May 11, 2026
A Motion was filed.
Key Issues
- • Unopposed motion to dismiss
- • Termination of defendant
- • Extension of time for responsive pleadings
- • Multiple defendants
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 6/10/2025. Defendant Kripakaran's Motion to Dismiss 17 is GRANTED as
Order · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Presiding Judge
1 linked entity
Judge
Michael M. Mihm
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Michael M. Mihm.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Judge Michael M. Mihm granted Defendant Kripakaran's motion to dismiss on June 10, 2025, after the motion went unopposed. The court ordered the clerk to terminate Kripakaran as a defendant in the case.
Meanwhile, Defendants Broyles, Fitz, and Treanor requested and received an extension of time to file their responsive pleading. Their new deadline to respond is June 26, 2025. The motions were resolved without opposition, indicating no immediate dispute over these procedural matters.
The case remains active with these defendants still involved. The docket and court details remain unspecified, but the recent orders clarify the current posture. The dismissal of Kripakaran narrows the field of defendants, while the extension for Broyles, Fitz, and Treanor delays the next substantive filings.
The court’s rulings suggest a focus on managing deadlines and streamlining parties at this stage.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 6/10/2025. Defendant Kripakaran's Motion to Dismiss 17 is GRANTED as unopposed. Clerk to terminate Defendant Kripakaran. Separately, Defendants Broyles, Fitz, and Treanor's Motion for Extension of Time 18 is GRANTED as unopposed. Defendants Broyles, Fitz, and Treanor's responsive pleading is due 6/26/25. (KE)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventTEXT ORDER entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 6/10/2025. Defendant Kripakaran's Motion to Dismiss 17 is GRANTED as unopposed. Clerk to terminate Defendant Kripakaran. Separately, Defendants Broyles, Fitz, and Treanor's Motion for Extension of Time 18 is GRANTED as unopposed. Defendants Broyles, Fitz, and Treanor's
A Motion was filed.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
6 hours, 52 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.