ORDER - Finding no opposition to the Motion and otherwise for good cause shown, Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. 19 ) is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff SHALL file her response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or an Amended Complaint on or before January 16, 2026. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Roderick C. Young on 12/18/2025. (ewat, ) (Entered: 12/18/2025)

The court granted the plaintiff's unopposed motion for an extension of time to respond to the defendant's motion to dismiss. District Judge Roderick C. Young issued the order on December 18, 2025.

The plaintiff now must file either a response to the motion to dismiss or an amended complaint by January 16, 2026. The extension came without opposition from the defendant, indicating no immediate dispute over the schedule. This case remains active, but the docket does not specify the underlying claims or parties beyond the plaintiff and defendant labels.

The judge's order focuses solely on procedural timing, not on the merits of the motion to dismiss. The next substantive step hinges on the plaintiff's filing, which will determine whether the court will address the sufficiency of the complaint or consider a revised pleading.

The court has not yet ruled on the motion to dismiss itself, so the case status depends on the plaintiff's forthcoming submission. The absence of opposition to the extension suggests cooperation or strategic delay rather than contention at this stage. The docket number for the extension motion is 19, and the case remains under Judge Young's oversight.

The court's order sets a firm deadline, signaling that the case will move forward promptly once the plaintiff responds.