ORDER - Finding that Defendant timely filed a responsive pleading, Defendant's Consent Motion for Further Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint (ECF No. 14 ) is hereby DENIED AS MOOT. It is so ORDERED. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by District Judge Roderick C. Young on 12/9/2025. (ewat, ) (Entered: 12/09/2025)

The court found that the defendant filed a responsive pleading on time, rendering the defendant's motion for an extension of time unnecessary. On December 9, 2025, District Judge Roderick C. Young denied the defendant's consent motion for a further extension to respond to the complaint as moot.

The motion appeared at docket number 14. The judge’s order confirms the defendant met the deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint, eliminating the need for additional time. This ruling clarifies the procedural posture and keeps the case moving forward without delay caused by extension requests.

The case remains active under Judge Young’s supervision, but the docket does not show the original filing date or the court’s jurisdiction. The next significant step will likely involve the plaintiff’s reply or further motions addressing the merits of the complaint.

The denial of the extension motion signals the court’s expectation that the parties proceed on schedule.