ORDER - Having considered the CONSENT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (ECF No. 38 ), and for good cause shown, and there being no objection by the defendant thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the CONSENT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (ECF No. 38 ) is granted. It is further ORDERED that: By April 30, 2026, the plaintiff shall file her response to DEFENDANT AION MANAGEMENT LLC'S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (ECF No. 33 ); and By May 14, 2026, AION
Case Summary
ORDER - Having considered the CONSENT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (ECF No. 38 ), and for good cause shown, and there being no objection by the defendant thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the CONSENT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (ECF No. 38 ) is granted. It is further ORDERED that: By April 30, 2026, the plaintiff shall file her response to DEFENDANT AION MANAGEMENT LLC'S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (ECF No. 33 ); and By May 14, 2026, AION Management LLC, shall file its reply. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 3/30/2026. (jenjones, ) (Entered: 03/30/2026)
Latest development
ORDER - Having considered the CONSENT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (ECF No. 38 ), and for good cause shown, and there being no objection by the defendant thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the CONSENT MOTION FOR
Order · May 10, 2026
An Amended COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM was filed.
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
ORDER - Having considered the CONSENT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (ECF No. 38 ), and for good cause shown, and there
Order · May 10, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Presiding Judge, 1 Related Organization
2 linked entities
Judge
Robert E. Payne
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 10, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Robert E. Payne and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
The court granted a consent motion extending the deadline for the plaintiff to respond to Aion Management LLC's partial motion to dismiss the first amended complaint. District Judge Robert E. Payne approved the extension on March 30, 2026, after the defendant raised no objection.
The plaintiff now must file her response by April 30, 2026. Aion Management LLC must file its reply by May 14, 2026. The partial motion to dismiss challenges the sufficiency of the plaintiff's claims in the amended complaint.
The case remains active with these briefing deadlines set. The court's order signals ongoing dispute over whether the plaintiff's allegations meet the legal standards to survive dismissal. The docket reflects the procedural posture focused on motions to dismiss, a common early-stage hurdle in federal litigation.
The parties appear to be cooperating on scheduling, as shown by the consent motion. The next key event will be the plaintiff's response, which will frame the arguments opposing dismissal. The court will then consider the reply before deciding whether to dismiss any claims or allow the case to proceed.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
ORDER - Having considered the CONSENT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (ECF No. 38 ), and for good cause shown, and there being no objection by the defendant thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the CONSENT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (ECF No. 38 ) is granted. It is further ORDERED that: By April 30, 2026, the plaintiff shall file her response to DEFENDANT AION MANAGEMENT LLC'S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (ECF No. 33 ); and By May 14, 2026, AION Mana
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventORDER - Having considered the CONSENT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (ECF No. 38 ), and for good cause shown, and there being no objection by the defendant thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the CONSENT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (ECF No. 38 ) is granted. It is further ORDERED that: By April 30, 2026, the plaintiff
An Amended COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM was filed.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
9 hours, 36 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.