ORDER - Having considered the Motion and for good cause shown, the Court hereby GRANTS the Motion for Extension (ECF No. 29 ). It is so ORDERED. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS AND DEADLINES. Signed by District Judge Roderick C. Young on 2/12/2026. (ewat, ) (Entered: 02/12/2026)

District Judge Roderick C. Young granted a motion for extension on February 12, 2026, adjusting the case schedule. The order, docketed as No.

29, does not specify the new deadlines or the reasons behind the extension beyond stating good cause. This procedural move pauses the existing timeline, allowing the parties more time to meet upcoming obligations.

The case remains active, but the public record does not reveal the parties involved, the claims at issue, or the court where the case is pending. The extension order focuses solely on timing and does not address any substantive motions or rulings. Judge Young’s decision reflects standard case management practice to accommodate parties’ requests for additional time.

This extension could affect the pace of the litigation, potentially delaying briefing schedules, discovery deadlines, or trial preparation. Without further docket entries or filings, it is unclear what specific deadlines were extended or how this will impact the overall case trajectory. The court’s order instructs the parties to comply with the updated schedule.

The lack of detail leaves the case’s substantive issues and procedural posture opaque. Observers will need to monitor the docket for new filings that clarify the nature of the dispute and the next steps in the litigation. Judge Young’s order confirms the court’s control over case management and responsiveness to procedural requests.

This development is routine in federal litigation, where courts often grant extensions to ensure parties have sufficient time to prepare their cases. The case remains open and active, with the new deadlines setting the immediate procedural framework.