Browse Cases

Central District of California

In the case 2:20-cv-10627 MEDWELL, LLC v. CIGNA CORPORATION et al, MEDWELL, LLC initiated litigation against CIGNA Corporation and other defendants. The dispute involves contractual or business-related issues between the parties, as indicated by the nature of the filings. A recent docket entry includes a letter filed

Central District of California

In the case 2:25-cv-07103 Big Boy Restaurant Group, LLC v. Rick Truhls et al, Big Boy Restaurant Group, LLC has filed a lawsuit against Rick Truhls and other defendants. The dispute appears to concern business operations or contractual issues, given the nature of the parties involved. An order has been issued in the

Central District of California

In the case of Edmond Babakhanlou v. Los Angeles County et al, the plaintiff has filed an objection as part of ongoing civil litigation against Los Angeles County and other defendants. Although specific details of the objection and the underlying claims are not provided, the dispute involves governmental entities and

Central District of California

In the case 2:25-cv-11718, Paul Butakov initiated legal action against the National Association of Bunco Investigators (NABI) and additional defendants. The litigation currently centers on an objection filed by Butakov to a Report and Recommendation issued by a magistrate judge. Such reports generally address pretrial

Central District of California

The case 2:25-cv-09394 Kendra Gilliams v. Kenneth Rivers is currently in its early procedural phase. The court has issued a show cause order, which mandates that a party must provide justification or explanation regarding a particular issue before the court decides on further action. Specific details about the

Central District of California

Thomas O. Rourke v. Hilton Management LLC et al, docket number 25-cv-08979, is a civil lawsuit involving a dispute between the plaintiff, Thomas O. Rourke, and defendants Hilton Management LLC and other related parties. The case is currently in the pretrial phase, with the court issuing a scheduling notice to

Central District of California

AMP Plus, Inc. v. Nora Lighting, Inc., docket number 24-cv-08460, involves a legal dispute between two corporate entities. Although specific claims and factual details are not provided, the case is actively progressing as indicated by the filing of a status report. This report suggests ongoing procedural matters such

Central District of California

The case 5:24-cv-01894 Brynn Grossman v. Brooklyn Bedding LLC is a civil dispute between the plaintiff, Brynn Grossman, and the defendant, Brooklyn Bedding LLC. While specific factual allegations or claims have not been disclosed, the docket indicates ongoing procedural activity, including a motion hearing and the

Central District of California

This case involves a miscellaneous matter before a magistrate judge concerning an application and order related to warrants under 18 U.S.C. § 2703. The docket number 26-mj-02665 indicates it is a magistrate-level proceeding, typically involving requests for electronic surveillance or data disclosure from service

Central District of California

The case titled USA v. Ramirez-Vasquez, docket number 25-cr-00759, involves criminal proceedings against the defendant Ramirez-Vasquez. Specific details of the case are not publicly available as the relevant documents are sealed.

Central District of California

In the case of Valencia Green v. Lowes Home Centers, LLC et al, docket number 25-cv-02300, the court dealt with a procedural issue concerning the striking of an electronically filed document, identified as G-106. The motion or order sought to remove this document from the court record, indicating a dispute over the

Central District of California

The case USA v. Nunez et al, docket number 08-cr-00763, is a criminal proceeding involving multiple defendants. Specific details regarding the charges, factual background, and procedural history are not available.

Central District of California

In the case 2:22-cv-00665 Maadanian v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC et al, the plaintiff initiated legal action against Mercedes-Benz USA LLC and potentially other defendants. The docket entry referenced is a Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel, indicating that one of the attorneys representing a party in the case has formally

Central District of California

The case of Lance Mancuso et al v. Matt Tauber et al, docket number 12-cv-10360, involves civil litigation between the plaintiffs, Lance Mancuso and others, and the defendants, Matt Tauber and others. The court issued a judgment or renewal of judgment, indicating a resolution or reaffirmation of a prior decision in

Central District of California

In the case 2:23-cv-08517 Royme Robinson v. Imani Wilcox et al, plaintiff Royme Robinson has initiated a lawsuit against Imani Wilcox and additional defendants. The litigation is currently active, with the parties engaged in pretrial proceedings, including contested motions. Defendants have filed a response opposing

Central District of California

The case USA v. Mektrakern, docket number 04-mj-02118, involved a magistrate complaint filed against the defendant. The complaint was classified as non-petty, indicating that the alleged charges were more serious than minor infractions. the magistrate court dismissed the complaint, effectively ending the case at this

Central District of California

The case of Nathan Gaines v. LPC Survival, LTD, docket number 25-cv-09291, involves ongoing civil litigation between the plaintiff, Nathan Gaines, and the defendant, LPC Survival, LTD. Although specific claims and defenses have not been disclosed, recent filings indicate active motion practice, including a reply brief

Central District of California

In the case 2:21-cv-07745 Cyrus Sanai v. Melanie Lawrence et al, plaintiff Cyrus Sanai filed a lawsuit against Melanie Lawrence and additional defendants. The litigation involves multiple parties and has progressed through various procedural stages, as indicated by numerous filings and court statements. Although the

Central District of California

In the case 2:24-cv-02400 Fernando Raymundo v. Cambridge Healthcare Services, LLC et al, plaintiff Fernando Raymundo has initiated a lawsuit against Cambridge Healthcare Services and additional defendants. Although the precise nature of the claims is not disclosed, the litigation is active and procedural steps such as

Central District of California

In the case of Antwone Stokes v. J. Higuera et al, docket number 25-cv-08172, the plaintiff, Antwone Stokes, has filed a civil lawsuit against defendant J. Higuera and additional parties. The case is notable for proceeding without prepayment of filing fees, suggesting that the plaintiff was granted in forma pauperis