Browse Cases

Northern District of Illinois

In the case Norwood v. Jamie Griffith, et al., docket number 1:25-cv-02914, the parties are involved in litigation that has necessitated the issuance of a protective order. While specific details of the underlying dispute are not provided, the protective order indicates that sensitive information or materials are at

Northern District of Illinois

In the case of Megan Waggener Van Meter, et al v. Mondelez International, Inc., the parties are engaged in litigation that involves discovery disputes. The court issued an order on a motion for an extension of time to complete discovery, indicating ongoing procedural management of the case timeline. The extension

Northern District of Illinois

In the case 5:25-cv-07914 Akay v. MAS Financial LLC et al, the parties submitted a stipulation and proposed order to the court, indicating an agreement on certain procedural or substantive matters. While specific details of the stipulation are not provided, such filings typically reflect negotiated resolutions or

Northern District of California

This case, titled JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association v. Aleyasin, involves a legal dispute brought by JPMorgan Chase Bank against the defendant, Aleyasin. The docket number is 26-cv-20245, though the specific court is not identified. The available document is a Notice of Attorney Appearance, indicating that an

Northern District of California

The court addressed a motion to dismiss filed by the defendant in USA v. Wilson, docket number 22-cr-00856. The order on the motion evaluated the legal sufficiency of the charges brought against Wilson, considering whether the indictment met the necessary standards to proceed to trial. The court's decision clarified

Eastern District of Texas

In the case 2:25-cv-00054, Cornell University and other plaintiffs have filed a lawsuit against AT&T Inc. and additional defendants. The litigation appears to involve a request for miscellaneous relief, although specific details about the claims or the nature of the dispute are not provided in the available docket

District of New Jersey

In the case titled Rodriguez-Garrido v. Lyons et al, docket number 1:26-cv-21483, the court has issued a summons that has been executed as to the United States defendants. This indicates that the defendants affiliated with the U.S. government have been formally served with the complaint or legal documents initiating

District of New Jersey

The case titled 2:25-cv-02747 Bhandari v. Bondi et al involves a motion related to setting or resetting a noting date, which is a procedural step in litigation to schedule when a motion will be considered by the court. The docket entry indicates that this is a public filing, but no substantive details about the

District of New Jersey

The case 7:20-cr-00164-2 USA v. Smith involves a request for a reduction of sentence based on the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) Amendment. The motion was filed under docket number 20-cr-00164 and involved a request for reconsideration of the sentence in light of changes to sentencing guidelines.

District of Massachusetts

In the case Fitzgerald v. Circle Internet Financial LLC, docket number 25-cv-12561, the plaintiff Fitzgerald has filed a response that is not related to any motion. The case is currently before an unspecified court, and the document referenced appears to be a procedural filing rather than a substantive motion or

District of Colorado

In the case titled Doe v. United States Center for SafeSport et al, docket number 25-cv-03205, the plaintiff, identified as Doe, has brought a legal action against the United States Center for SafeSport and other defendants. The case involves allegations that are currently subject to a stay, indicating that

Central District of California

In the case of Drew Hunthausen v. Crocs Retail, LLC, docket number 25-cv-04199, the parties are engaged in litigation involving a discovery dispute, as indicated by the recent order addressing a discovery matter. While specific details of the underlying claims are not provided, the court's involvement in resolving

Central District of California

The case titled USA v. Ortega, docket number 25-mj-03872, involves a matter before a magistrate court as indicated by the 'mj' designation in the docket number. The recent filing is a Notice of Filing Transcript, which suggests that a transcript of proceedings has been submitted to the court record. Details about the

Central District of California

In the case 2:24-cv-02394 Baxter Bailey and Associates, Inc. v. Niagara Bottling, LLC et al, Baxter Bailey and Associates, Inc. has initiated legal proceedings against Niagara Bottling, LLC and other defendants. The case involves a notice of lodging, indicating that certain documents or evidence have been formally

Central District of California

In the criminal case titled USA v. Nguyen, et al, docket number 00-cr-00118, the court issued an order documented as entry 484. While specific details of the order are not provided, the case involves multiple defendants and pertains to federal criminal proceedings.

Central District of California

In the case of Connie Kim v. Cushman and Wakefield U.S., Inc. et al, the plaintiff, Connie Kim, has brought a lawsuit against Cushman and Wakefield U.S., Inc. and other defendants. The case involves a dispute that has led to the filing of a motion by one party, to which the opposing party has submitted a formal

Central District of California

The case titled WTO Express U.S.A. Corp., et al v. SVES LLC et al, docket number 25-cv-12202, involves a dispute between the named parties. The available information indicates that a motion or order to dismiss the case has been filed or granted, as referenced by the docket entry. Specific details about the underlying

Central District of California

In the case 2:25-cv-11349 AR Young Investments, LLC v. Manny Halley Productions, LLC et al, the parties are involved in litigation where a motion for an extension of time to file a response or reply has been filed. The case docket indicates procedural activity concerning deadlines, suggesting ongoing pre-trial motions

Central District of California

The case 2:24-cv-05715 Geon Hwang et al v. Chiquita Canyon, LLC et al involves plaintiffs Geon Hwang and others filing a lawsuit against Chiquita Canyon, LLC and additional defendants. While specific details of the claims are not provided, the docket entry references a substitution of attorney, indicating a procedural

Central District of California

The case titled United States of America v. Frank Agrama, docket number 19-cv-09204, involves a federal legal proceeding against Frank Agrama. The available information indicates a procedural update regarding the reassignment of the case due to the unavailability of a magistrate judge. Specific details about the