Browse Cases

Northern District of California

The case involves a criminal proceeding against the defendant Sanchez. The case includes a motion to seal certain documents, indicating sensitive information or privacy concerns related to the public record.

Northern District of California

The case titled 3:25-cv-09396 LS 651 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al involves a plaintiff initiating legal action against Uber Technologies, Inc. and possibly other defendants. The docket reflects a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by the plaintiff, indicating that the plaintiff has chosen to dismiss the case

Northern District of California

In the case 3:19-cv-06344 Nessmith et al v. Altria Group, Inc. et al, the plaintiffs brought claims against Altria Group, Inc. and other defendants. The case involves motions for miscellaneous relief, as indicated by the referenced court order. While specific factual details and claims are not provided, the litigation

Northern District of California

In the case 3:24-cv-06194 Lee v. Foris Dax, Inc. et al, the parties have submitted a Joint Case Management Statement outlining the procedural posture and key issues for the litigation. While specific factual details are not provided, the filing indicates ongoing coordination between the parties and the court to manage

Northern District of California

In the case 3:23-cv-00770 Mobley v. Workday, Inc., the plaintiff Mobley has brought a legal action against Workday, Inc. The specific details of the dispute are not provided, but the case involves an order issued by the court as referenced in docket entry 305. The nature of the order and the underlying claims remain

Northern District of California

In the case titled Shepard v. Perez et al, docket number 25-cv-09484, the parties addressed the issue of whether to consent or decline to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. This procedural matter involves the decision by the parties to either allow the Magistrate Judge to handle all aspects of the case

Northern District of California

The case titled USA v. Fabiani, docket number 25-cr-05077, involves criminal proceedings against the defendant Fabiani. While specific details of the charges are not provided, the case is currently active as indicated by a Notice of Hearing.

District of New Jersey

In the case 2:25-cv-15514 KHATER v. ATLANTIC HEALTH SYSTEM, the primary procedural development involves a letter concerning remand. The case appears to be in the early stages, with the parties addressing jurisdictional or procedural questions related to whether the matter should be returned to a state court or remain

Central District of California

In the case 2:25-cv-03938 Kaori Sandhu et al v. Cardinal Health Inc. et al, plaintiffs Kaori Sandhu and others have filed a lawsuit against Cardinal Health Inc. and additional defendants. The available docket information primarily reflects procedural activity, including a motion for appearance pro hac vice, which

Central District of California

In the case 2:25-cv-03667, Amir Edwards has filed a lawsuit against United Wholesale Mortgage, LLC and other defendants. The case involves a motion to which an objection or opposition has been filed, indicating ongoing procedural disputes between the parties. Specific details about the nature of the claims or the

Central District of California

The case titled Shapiro et al v. Jacobson et al, docket number 23-cv-03964, currently lacks detailed publicly available information due to a notice regarding a deleted document. As such, the specific facts, claims, and procedural posture of the litigation remain unclear. Without access to the substantive filings or

Central District of California

In the case titled USA v. Gutierrez, docket number 2:26-mj-02212-1, the government filed a request for detention concerning the defendant, Gutierrez. The request likely pertains to whether the defendant should be held in custody pending further proceedings, based on factors such as flight risk or danger to the

Central District of California

The case 2:25-cv-03047 Topical Branding LLC v. Adam Ambruso et al involves a dispute between Topical Branding LLC and the defendants, including Adam Ambruso. The docket entry referenced is a Notice of Assignment of Panel Mediator, indicating that the court has designated a mediator to facilitate alternative dispute

Central District of California

The case titled Starbucks Corporation v. Valtrus Innovations Limited et al, docket number 25-cv-01859, was a civil litigation matter involving Starbucks Corporation as the plaintiff and Valtrus Innovations Limited along with other defendants. The case was terminated, indicating that the court has closed the matter

Central District of California

In the case of Jane Doe v. Quanovate Tech Inc., docket number 25-cv-12201, the plaintiff submitted a non-opposition to a motion filed by the defendant or another party. This procedural filing indicates that the plaintiff does not contest the relief sought in the motion, potentially facilitating the court's approval of

Central District of California

The case of USA v. Figueroa, docket number 24-cr-05167, involves a stipulated motion submitted to the court. The specifics of the motion and the underlying facts of the case are not detailed in the available information. As a criminal case, it involves the United States government prosecuting an individual named

Central District of California

In the case of Taylor Thomson v. Persistence Technologies BVI Pte Ltd. et al, the plaintiff, Taylor Thomson, has initiated legal action against Persistence Technologies BVI Pte Ltd. and additional defendants. The lawsuit is currently pending, with procedural matters such as objections being actively addressed by the

Central District of California

In the case of Geraldine Matthews v. John G. Burlison et al, the plaintiff Geraldine Matthews has filed a lawsuit against John G. Burlison and additional defendants. The litigation involves multiple parties and is currently active, though the specific claims and factual background have not been disclosed. Procedural

Central District of California

In the case of USA v. Barba, docket number 16-cr-00032, the court addressed a petition concerning the defendant's probation and supervised release status. The petition, filed under Probation Form 12, typically involves allegations of violations of the terms set forth during the defendant's supervised release period.

Central District of California

In the case 2:20-cv-08499 Christine Pino v. Cardone Capital, LLC et al, plaintiff Christine Pino initiated litigation against Cardone Capital, LLC and additional defendants. The dispute appears to involve contractual or business-related issues, given the nature of the parties involved. An order identified as document