Browse Cases

Southern District of New York

The case 1:22-cv-08137 Charbern Management Group LLC v. Borah, Goldstein, Altschuler, Nahins & Goidel, P.C. is a civil dispute involving Charbern Management Group LLC and the law firm Borah, Goldstein, Altschuler, Nahins & Goidel, P.C. Specific claims or causes of action have not been disclosed, but the case is active

Southern District of New York

The case 1:24-cv-06102 Adasa Inc. v. R-Pac International LLC involves a civil dispute between the two parties. Recent docket activity shows that the court is managing procedural aspects of the litigation, including a request for an extension of time related to filing deadlines or responses. While the specific claims

Central District of California

Gerardo Cabanillas filed a lawsuit against the City of South Gate and additional defendants under docket number 24-cv-08027. The case record indicates a substitution of attorney, reflecting a change in legal representation for one of the parties involved. However, the available information does not disclose the nature

Southern District of New York

Rockefeller Photos, LLC filed a lawsuit against Antillana, Metro Supermarket, Corp., and additional defendants. While the precise nature of the underlying dispute is not disclosed, the case is currently in the pretrial phase, with recent docket activity involving requests for extensions of time to file documents. This

Southern District of New York

Nike, Inc. has filed a lawsuit against Lululemon USA Inc., initiating litigation under docket number 23-cv-00771. Although the precise claims have not been disclosed, the case involves active pretrial proceedings, including the submission of declarations supporting motions. The dispute likely centers on issues related

Southern District of New York

In the case Barrales et al v. Conopco, Inc., the plaintiffs initiated legal proceedings against Conopco, Inc. The specific allegations or claims made by the plaintiffs are not detailed in the available information. The case was assigned docket number 25-cv-10390, but the court overseeing the matter is not identified.

Central District of California

The case 2:24-cv-09795 Rina I Gonzalez v. Martin O'Malley centers on a dispute regarding the award of attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). The EAJA permits prevailing parties in certain civil actions against the government to recover reasonable attorney fees and expenses. In this matter, one

Northern District of California

In the case 3:16-cv-07244 Siqueiros v. General Motors LLC, the plaintiff, Siqueiros, brought a lawsuit against General Motors LLC. The case involves ongoing litigation, with recent activity including the filing of a status report as documented in docket entry 739. While specific factual details and claims are not

Eastern District of Texas

In the case 4:19-cv-00711 Carey et al v. Dallas Nephrology Associates, the plaintiffs filed a reply brief in response to the defendant's opposition to a motion, indicating active procedural litigation. Although specific factual details and the nature of the claims are not disclosed, the filing reflects ongoing

District of New Jersey

In the case 2:25-cv-17354 SEDGES v. BARBATO, the parties are actively engaged in litigation with ongoing procedural briefing related to a motion filed by one party and an opposition filed by the other. The most recent docket entry indicates that a reply brief has been submitted to address the opposition, suggesting

District of Columbia

The case United States of America v. Enlightened, Inc., docket number 24-mc-00120, involves legal proceedings initiated by the federal government against Enlightened, Inc. While the government has filed a status report indicating ongoing procedural developments, specific details regarding the claims, defenses, or

District of Colorado

Dixon v. Metropolitan State University of Denver Colorado, docket number 23-cv-00606, is an ongoing civil litigation matter involving an unspecified dispute between the plaintiff, Dixon, and the university. While the precise nature of the claims has not been disclosed, the case is currently in the pretrial phase.

Central District of California

In the case Federal Trade Commission v. Top Healthcare Options Insurance Agency Inc. et al, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) initiated legal action against Top Healthcare Options Insurance Agency and associated parties. The case involves allegations likely related to unfair or deceptive business practices, as is

Central District of California

The case USA v. Sutton et al, docket number 15-cr-00407, involves criminal proceedings against multiple defendants prosecuted by the United States government. The matter is currently before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, indicating that the case has progressed beyond the trial court level and is now under appellate

Central District of California

In the case 5:24-cv-02674 HR Direct Services, Inc. v. United States of America, the plaintiff, HR Direct Services, Inc., has filed a motion seeking to extend the discovery cut-off date. Discovery is a critical pre-trial phase during which both parties exchange relevant information and evidence. The plaintiff's request

Central District of California

In the case of Angela Smith v. Universal Content Productions LLC et al, the plaintiff Angela Smith brought claims against Universal Content Productions LLC and additional defendants. The nature of the claims has not been publicly disclosed. The dispute was resolved through a settlement agreement, allowing the parties

Central District of California

The case 5:24-cv-01814 Milton Yates v. Carmichael International Service et al involves a legal dispute between the plaintiff, Milton Yates, and the defendant, Carmichael International Service, along with other parties. While specific factual allegations or claims have not been disclosed, the docket indicates active

Central District of California

In the case 1:26-cv-21047 De La Torre Pardo v. JTCW INVESTMENTS LLC, the court issued an order requiring the parties to submit a joint scheduling report. This procedural order is typically aimed at organizing the timeline and key deadlines for the litigation process, including discovery, motions, and trial dates. The

Central District of California

The case 5:15-cv-02043 Rosie Camacho v. John McHugh is a civil dispute between the plaintiff, Rosie Camacho, and the defendant, John McHugh. The available information centers on a procedural matter involving the clerk's taxation of costs, which is a step taken after a judgment or decision has been rendered. This

Central District of California

In the case titled DOE v. THE COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY, docket number 24-cv-09280, the parties participated in a status conference to discuss the progress and management of the litigation. The case involves an anonymous plaintiff, referred to as DOE, against The College of New Jersey. Details regarding the specific