Browse Cases

Central District of California

In the case City of Torrance v. Hi-Shear Corporation, the City of Torrance initiated legal proceedings against Hi-Shear Corporation under docket number 17-cv-07732. While specific factual allegations and claims are not detailed in the available information, the case appears to involve a dispute between the municipal

Central District of California

The case of Jason Kiss v. Aspiriant, LLC, docket number 25-cv-12100, involves ongoing litigation between the named parties. Although specific details about the underlying dispute are not provided, the record indicates active procedural developments, including the filing of a motion reply by one of the parties. The

Central District of California

In the case of Frank Dominguez v. County of Los Angeles California et al, the plaintiff Frank Dominguez filed a lawsuit against the County of Los Angeles and additional defendants. The specific claims and factual background of the case are not disclosed in the available information. Recently, a motion to dismiss has

Central District of California

In the case of Randall Earl Williams Jr v. Ferrari Financial Services Inc., the plaintiff has filed a lawsuit against the defendant, Ferrari Financial Services Inc. While specific claims and defenses have not been disclosed, the procedural record includes a Proof of Service document, indicating that the case is

Central District of California

The case Adelaida Martinez v. Carl's Jr. Restaurants LLC et al, docket number 25-cv-00535, is a civil litigation matter involving the plaintiff, Adelaida Martinez, and the defendant, Carl's Jr. Restaurants LLC along with other parties. The available documentation is limited to a scheduling notice that sets procedural

Central District of California

In the case 1:25-cv-25908 Sunhoney LLC v. Shein Distribution Corporation et al, Sunhoney LLC initiated legal proceedings against Shein Distribution Corporation and other defendants. The case involves a complaint filed by Sunhoney LLC, to which the defendants have submitted an answer, indicating their formal response

Central District of California

The case 3:24-cv-05597 involves a plaintiff named Niles filing a lawsuit against the United States government and potentially other defendants. The docket references a Joint Status Report Order Form submitted to the court, indicating early procedural steps in the litigation process. Specific factual or legal claims

Central District of California

In the case Julian Vargas et al v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc. et al, plaintiffs Julian Vargas and others have initiated legal action against Quest Diagnostics and additional defendants. Although specific allegations are not detailed, the litigation is currently in the pretrial phase, as indicated by

Central District of California

In the case 2:23-cv-08882 Tresor Maleka Ndandu v. Alvarado et al, the plaintiff, Tresor Maleka Ndandu, has filed a lawsuit against multiple defendants including Alvarado. The case is currently pending in an unspecified court, with limited publicly available information regarding the specific factual allegations or

Central District of California

The case Charles Johnson v. J. Fernald et al, docket number 25-cv-09297, involves plaintiff Charles Johnson and multiple defendants including J. Fernald. The court issued an In Chambers Order or Directive, which is a procedural action taken without a formal hearing or oral argument. The specific content or subject

Central District of California

In the case 2:21-cv-06815 Ispot.TV, Inc. v. Nadya Teyfukova, Ispot.TV, Inc., a corporate plaintiff, filed a lawsuit against defendant Nadya Teyfukova. The litigation is ongoing in a federal court, as indicated by the docket number format. Although specific details of the dispute are not disclosed, the case involves

Central District of California

In the case 2:24-cv-01951 Gerald A. Gauthier v. 3M Company et al, plaintiff Gerald A. Gauthier has initiated a federal lawsuit against 3M Company and additional defendants. While specific allegations and claims are not detailed, the involvement of 3M suggests the dispute may center on product liability or corporate

Central District of California

In the case 2:24-cv-08454 Data on Tap Inc. v. Mobile X Global, Inc., Data on Tap Inc. filed a lawsuit against Mobile X Global, Inc. The dispute centers on allegations set forth in the original complaint, though the precise nature of these claims is not disclosed. Mobile X Global, Inc. has responded by filing an

Central District of California

In the case 2:25-cv-11840 Omar J. Lizarraga Montero v. The ADT Security Corporation et al, plaintiff Omar J. Lizarraga Montero has filed a lawsuit against ADT Security Corporation and additional defendants. The specific claims and factual background of the dispute have not been disclosed in the available information.

Central District of California

In the case of Lakesha Williams v. APRO, LLC, docket number 25-cv-04994, the central issue involves a motion to dismiss filed by the defendant challenging the court's jurisdiction. The defendant contends that the court lacks the authority to hear the claims brought by the plaintiff, raising questions about subject

Central District of California

In case 2:21-cv-04290 Keith Anderson et al v. Chief John E. Perez et al, plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against law enforcement officials alleging violations of their civil rights. The claims focus on police conduct and assert that the defendants, including Chief John E. Perez, engaged in actions that infringed upon the

Central District of California

The case Nancy L Jeppesen et al v. Scott Cramer et al, docket number 25-cv-05895, involves ongoing litigation between the named parties. While the specific facts and claims underlying the dispute are not disclosed, the case is currently active with procedural motions being contested. The parties have filed formal

Central District of California

Bryan Crane has filed a civil lawsuit against Integon National Insurance Company, initiating litigation under docket number 25-cv-06382. The case involves a dispute likely centered on insurance coverage or claims handling, as suggested by the nature of the parties involved. A memorandum in support of a motion has been

Central District of California

Liberty Insurance Corporation initiated a civil lawsuit against Victor Corral, as indicated by the service of summons and complaint. The summons was successfully served and returned executed within 21 days, marking the formal commencement of the litigation process. The case is identified by docket number 25-cv-03253

Central District of California

The case Fuller v. Stratton, docket number 04-cv-01212, involves a procedural matter concerning the reassignment of the case due to the unavailability of the originally assigned judicial officer. The reassignment was documented through an official court notice, indicating a change in the presiding judge to ensure the