Browse Cases

Central District of California

In USA v. Lopez-Ayon, docket number 25-mj-00770, the defendant chose to waive the preliminary examination or hearing. This procedural decision means that the defendant agreed to bypass the initial judicial review that assesses whether sufficient evidence exists to proceed to trial. By waiving this step, the case moves

Central District of California

In the case titled 2:25-cv-17858 SANGENITO et al v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC et al, the plaintiffs have initiated litigation against BMW of North America and potentially other defendants. The docket entry references a motion related to setting or resetting deadlines for motions and reports and recommendations (R&R)

Central District of California

In the case 2:25-cv-10467 Dakoda Harley James Woods v. Farmers Insurance Exchange et al, the plaintiff, Dakoda Harley James Woods, has filed a lawsuit against Farmers Insurance Exchange and possibly other defendants. The litigation is currently in its early procedural phase, with the defendants seeking an extension of

Central District of California

In the case Edward Lewis et al v. Magnite, Inc, multiple plaintiffs have initiated legal action against Magnite, Inc. While specific allegations and claims have not been disclosed, the involvement of multiple plaintiffs indicates the possibility of a class or collective action. The case is currently active, with

Central District of California

Shenzhenshi Qilehuikejiyouxiangongsi has filed a civil lawsuit against Oralic Supplies, Inc., initiating litigation under docket number 25-cv-09657. The case is currently pending in an unspecified court, and the proceedings appear to be in the early stages based on the nature of the docket entries available. No

Central District of California

The case 2:24-cv-00703 Gabriel Castillo v. Naviot Sekhon et al involves a legal dispute between the plaintiff, Gabriel Castillo, and multiple defendants including Naviot Sekhon. A magistrate judge has reviewed the matter and issued a Notice of Report and Recommendation, which contains proposed findings and

Central District of California

In the case 8:24-cv-02778 Hasibullah Nawabi v. Carolyn Colvin, the plaintiff Hasibullah Nawabi initiated legal proceedings against Carolyn Colvin. The docket entry referenced pertains to an appearance filed in the case, indicating procedural steps in the litigation process. Specific details about the nature of the

Central District of California

The case Jeff Lambing v. Snap Lock Industries Inc. et al, docket number 25-cv-09575, involves litigation between the plaintiff Jeff Lambing and the defendant Snap Lock Industries Inc. along with additional parties. The current procedural posture includes a motion for leave to file a document, indicating active ongoing

Central District of California

In the case of Demetrius T. Freeman v. J. Zilliox et al, the plaintiff initiated legal action against the defendants, resulting in a motion for summary judgment. The court's role was to determine whether any genuine disputes of material fact existed that would necessitate a trial or if the defendants were entitled to

Western District of Washington

In the case 2:25-cv-02734 Xiamen Huangyudu Cosmetics Co Ltd. v. Interlink Products International Inc, the plaintiff, Xiamen Huangyudu Cosmetics Co Ltd., has initiated litigation against Interlink Products International Inc. The case appears to involve a dispute between these two commercial entities, likely concerning

Western District of Washington

The case titled Girton v. Walmart Inc, docket number 24-cv-01929, appears to have been terminated as a civil matter. Specific details regarding the nature of the dispute, claims, or parties' arguments are not provided. The termination suggests that the case was either dismissed, settled, or otherwise resolved without

Western District of Washington

The case titled Daniels v. Crotty et al, docket number 1:25-cv-20137, involves an appeal that has been forwarded to the United States Court of Appeals (USCA). While specific details of the underlying dispute are not provided, the procedural posture indicates that the case is currently under appellate review following

Southern District of New York

In this case, petitioner Chun-ko Chang filed an application under 28 U.S.C. § 1782 seeking a court order to obtain discovery from respondents Hongzhi Li and Rui Li. The discovery request is made pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and is intended to collect evidence for use in a foreign legal proceeding.

Southern District of New York

In the case Albert v. DistroKid LLC et al, docket number 25-cv-01705, the plaintiff Albert filed a lawsuit against DistroKid LLC and other defendants. The matter before the court involved a procedural request for an extension of time for the defendants to file their answer to the complaint. This request is a routine

Southern District of New York

The case 1:23-cv-01170 Basri v. Gordon et al is a civil dispute currently in the pre-trial phase before an unspecified court. The parties have submitted a Proposed Pre-Trial Order, which is a procedural document outlining the issues to be addressed at trial, agreements on evidentiary matters, and the scheduling of

Southern District of New York

In the case 1:23-cv-06895 Fanatics Collectibles Topco, Inc. v. Panini S.P.A., Fanatics Collectibles Topco, Inc. has filed a lawsuit against Panini S.P.A. concerning disputes related to the collectible trading card industry. Although specific claims are not detailed, the issues likely involve intellectual property

Southern District of New York

Liberty Mutual Insurance Company initiated a lawsuit against Day to Day Imports Inc. and additional defendants under docket number 22-cv-02181. The dispute centers around issues related to insurance coverage or claims, given Liberty Mutual's role as the plaintiff. While specific allegations and the relief sought have

Central District of California

The case 8:20-cv-01383 Ahmed Al Bakry v. Al H. Zadeh et al involves a legal dispute between the plaintiff, Ahmed Al Bakry, and multiple defendants including Al H. Zadeh. The case is currently in active litigation, with procedural motions and replies being filed, indicating ongoing legal arguments and case management

Southern District of New York

The case 1:24-cv-04683 Goldberg Weprin Finkel Goldstein LLP v. StateHouse Holdings, Inc. is a legal dispute between a law firm and a corporate entity. Although specific claims have not been disclosed, the involvement of a law firm as plaintiff and a corporation as defendant suggests issues related to contractual or

Southern District of New York

In the case 2:25-cv-00697 XR Communications LLC d/b/a Vivato Technologies v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., XR Communications, operating as Vivato Technologies, has initiated litigation against T-Mobile USA, Inc. The case involves a formal dispute between the two parties, with recent procedural developments including the filing