Parties Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge Under General Order 26-05

The case has been fully consented to under General Order 26-05, allowing it to proceed before a magistrate judge. The parties agreed to waive their right to a district judge, which means a magistrate judge will handle all pretrial and trial matters. The docket does not show a district judge assigned yet.

The court entered this status update on April 27, 2026, with no accompanying PDF or detailed filing. The case remains active, but the specific claims, parties, and court remain unidentified in the public docket. On May 12, 2026, the court issued an order, but the content of that order is not publicly available.

The lack of filings or a docket number limits insight into the case's substance or procedural posture. This procedural posture suggests the case is in early stages, focused on establishing jurisdiction and consent for magistrate judge jurisdiction.

The absence of a district judge assignment and the consent under General Order 26-05 indicate the parties seek a streamlined process. The case's next steps will likely involve initial case management and scheduling before the magistrate judge. The court's order from May 12 may set deadlines or address preliminary matters, but details are not disclosed.