Court refers case to Magistrate Judge King for pretrial matters and settlement
Case Summary
The court referred the case to Magistrate Judge King for all pretrial matters, including non-dispositive motions. Judge King is authorized to conduct a settlement conference at any time.
Latest development
TEXT ORDER: Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), the Court refers this matter to Magistrate Judge King for hearing and determining all pretrial matters, including non-dispositive motions. Judge King may conduct a settlement
Order · May 12, 2026
Judge King issued an order.
Key Issues
- • Referral to magistrate judge
- • Pretrial management
- • Settlement conference authority
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
TEXT ORDER: Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), the Court refers this matter to Magistrate Judge King for hearing and
Order · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 12, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
The court referred this case to Magistrate Judge King for all pretrial matters under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). This includes handling non-dispositive motions and the authority to conduct settlement conferences at any time.
The referral means Judge King will manage the case's procedural issues before trial. The original district judge has not yet been assigned. The docket does not provide details on the parties, claims, or the court where the case is pending.
The referral order was entered on April 29, 2026, signaling the case is active but still in early stages. Magistrate Judge King issued an order on May 12, 2026, indicating ongoing case management. The lack of attached documents or further filings suggests the case is still organizing its pretrial posture.
The referral to a magistrate judge is standard for managing motions and settlement efforts to streamline district court resources. Without more information on the claims or parties, the case’s substantive issues remain unclear. The next steps will focus on procedural rulings and possible settlement discussions under Judge King's supervision.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
TEXT ORDER: Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), the Court refers this matter to Magistrate Judge King for hearing and determining all pretrial matters, including non-dispositive motions. Judge King may conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: counsel (JM) (Entered: 04/29/2026)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventTEXT ORDER: Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), the Court refers this matter to Magistrate Judge King for hearing and determining all pretrial matters, including non-dispositive motions. Judge King may conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for
Judge King issued an order.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
14 hours, 42 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.