IFP Filing Fee Recorded in Steven Deon Turner v. California Department of Corrections
Case Summary
The Central District of California recorded an in forma pauperis (IFP) filing fee in Steven Deon Turner v. California Department of Corrections, docket number 16-cv-06764. This financial entry relates to the plaintiff's fee status in this civil rights or correctional facility case.
Latest development
2:16-cv-06764 Steven Deon Turner v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Filing · May 12, 2026
Steven Deon Turner filed a financial entry related to the in forma pauperis (IFP) filing fee in his case against the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. This filing addresses the payment or waiver of court fees, which affects Turner's ability to proceed without paying standard fees upfront. It matters because it determines whether Turner can continue his lawsuit without financial barriers.
description View filingKey Issues
- • IFP filing fee
- • Civil rights
- • Correctional facility
- • Central District of California
Docket Snapshot
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Initial filing stage
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:16-cv-06764 Steven Deon Turner v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Filing · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Government Agency, 1 Plaintiff
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a filing dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, 2:16-cv-06764 Steven Deon Turner and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Steven Deon Turner is suing the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and other defendants in the Central District of California. The case number is 16-cv-06764. Turner recently filed a financial entry concerning his request to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), which allows a litigant to waive court fees due to inability to pay.
The court has not yet assigned a judge to the case. The filing signals that Turner is seeking to avoid the standard filing fee, a common step in prisoner litigation. The case remains active but has not progressed beyond preliminary administrative matters.
The docket does not show any substantive motions or rulings yet. Turner's financial status and IFP request will determine whether the case can proceed without immediate payment. The defendants have not filed any responses or motions to dismiss at this stage.
The court will likely address the IFP request before scheduling further proceedings or setting deadlines. This case involves the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, suggesting the claims may relate to prison conditions, policies, or treatment, though the complaint details are not publicly available.
The next steps hinge on the court's ruling on Turner's IFP status and any subsequent scheduling orders.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Financial Entry IFP Filing Fee
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
1 event2:16-cv-06764 Steven Deon Turner v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Steven Deon Turner filed a financial entry related to the in forma pauperis (IFP) filing fee in his case against the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. This filing addresses the payment or waiver of court fees, which affects Turner's ability to proceed without paying standard fees upfront. It matters because it determines whether Turner can continue his lawsuit without financial barriers.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 hour, 13 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.