Marcus A. Smith v.Leanne Lundy
Case Summary
Marcus A. Smith filed a civil case against Leanne Lundy in the Central District of California, docket 24-cv-06814. The docket notes a financial entry regarding in forma pauperis filing fees.
Latest development
2:24-cv-06814 Marcus A. Smith v.Leanne Lundy
Filing · May 12, 2026
Marcus A. Smith filed a financial entry related to the in forma pauperis (IFP) filing fee in his case against Leanne Lundy. This filing indicates that Smith is requesting to proceed without paying the standard court fees due to financial hardship. The court will review this request to decide if Smith qualifies for fee waiver or reduced fees.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Fee waiver
- • Procedural status
Docket Snapshot
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Initial filing stage
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:24-cv-06814 Marcus A. Smith v.Leanne Lundy
Filing · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a filing dated May 12, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Marcus A. Smith initiated a civil case against Leanne Lundy in the Central District of California, docket number 24-cv-06814. The case is active but has not yet been assigned to a judge.
Smith recently filed a financial statement related to his request to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), indicating he seeks to waive the standard filing fee due to inability to pay. This procedural step is common in federal court when a plaintiff claims indigency and wants to avoid upfront costs.
The court has not issued any rulings or scheduled hearings in this matter. The absence of a judge assignment suggests the case remains in its early stages. The filing of the IFP financial statement will prompt the court to decide whether Smith qualifies for fee waiver status under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915. If granted, the case will proceed without Smith paying the filing fee; if denied, Smith must pay or risk dismissal.
The complaint's substance and the nature of the dispute between Smith and Lundy remain unclear from the docket. No motions or substantive pleadings have been filed or publicly noted. The case's progression depends on the court's ruling on the IFP request and any subsequent filings by either party.
This case illustrates the procedural hurdles plaintiffs face when seeking fee waivers in federal court. The court's decision on the IFP application will determine whether Smith can continue without financial barriers. The docket will likely fill out once the court acts on this request and the parties begin substantive litigation.
Watch for the court's ruling on the in forma pauperis application. That decision will set the pace for the case and clarify whether Smith can proceed without paying the filing fee.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Financial Entry IFP Filing Fee
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
1 event2:24-cv-06814 Marcus A. Smith v.Leanne Lundy
Marcus A. Smith filed a financial entry related to the in forma pauperis (IFP) filing fee in his case against Leanne Lundy. This filing indicates that Smith is requesting to proceed without paying the standard court fees due to financial hardship. The court will review this request to decide if Smith qualifies for fee waiver or reduced fees.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 hour, 22 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.