Tony Lee Hill v. City of Torrance California et al
Case Summary
Tony Lee Hill filed a case against the City of Torrance, California, and others in the Central District of California. The docket reflects a financial entry related to an in forma pauperis (IFP) filing fee, indicating the plaintiff sought to proceed without prepayment of court fees due to financial hardship.
Latest development
2:13-cv-02706 Tony Lee Hill v. City of Torrance California et al
Filing · May 12, 2026
Tony Lee Hill filed a financial entry related to the in forma pauperis (IFP) filing fee in his case against the City of Torrance, California. This filing indicates he is requesting to proceed without paying the standard court fees due to financial hardship. The court will review this to decide if he qualifies for fee waiver.
description View filingKey Issues
- • IFP filing
- • Financial hardship
- • Civil rights
- • Municipal defendant
Docket Snapshot
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Initial filing stage
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:13-cv-02706 Tony Lee Hill v. City of Torrance California et al
Filing · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a filing dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes City of Torrance California, 2:13-cv-02706 Tony Lee Hill.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Tony Lee Hill is suing the City of Torrance, California, and other defendants in the Central District of California under docket number 13-cv-02706. The case remains active but has not yet been assigned to a judge.
Hill recently filed a financial statement related to his request to proceed in forma pauperis, signaling his intention to avoid paying the court’s filing fee due to financial hardship. This procedural step often precedes a court decision on whether to grant fee waiver status.
The case’s underlying claims and causes of action have not been publicly detailed in the docket filings so far. The absence of a judge assignment and limited filings suggest the case is still in its early stages.
The court will next need to decide whether to grant Hill’s in forma pauperis status, which will determine if the case can move forward without immediate payment of fees. Once that decision is made, the court will likely assign a judge and set a schedule for initial pleadings or motions.
Monitoring the court’s ruling on the fee waiver and any subsequent judge assignment will provide the first clear signals of how the case will proceed.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Financial Entry IFP Filing Fee
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
1 event2:13-cv-02706 Tony Lee Hill v. City of Torrance California et al
Tony Lee Hill filed a financial entry related to the in forma pauperis (IFP) filing fee in his case against the City of Torrance, California. This filing indicates he is requesting to proceed without paying the standard court fees due to financial hardship. The court will review this to decide if he qualifies for fee waiver.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 hour, 26 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.