civil-litigation government-litigation federal-courts court-watch

Tony Lee Hill v. City of Torrance California et al

13-cv-02706 C.D. Cal.
Active Initial filing stage Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Tony Lee Hill filed a case against the City of Torrance, California, and others in the Central District of California. The docket reflects a financial entry related to an in forma pauperis (IFP) filing fee, indicating the plaintiff sought to proceed without prepayment of court fees due to financial hardship.

Latest development

2:13-cv-02706 Tony Lee Hill v. City of Torrance California et al

Filing · May 12, 2026

Tony Lee Hill filed a financial entry related to the in forma pauperis (IFP) filing fee in his case against the City of Torrance, California. This filing indicates he is requesting to proceed without paying the standard court fees due to financial hardship. The court will review this to decide if he qualifies for fee waiver.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • IFP filing
  • Financial hardship
  • Civil rights
  • Municipal defendant
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Initial filing stage

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:13-cv-02706 Tony Lee Hill v. City of Torrance California et al

Filing · May 12, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a filing dated May 12, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes City of Torrance California, 2:13-cv-02706 Tony Lee Hill.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 10 hours, 59 minutes ago

Tony Lee Hill is suing the City of Torrance, California, and other defendants in the Central District of California under docket number 13-cv-02706. The case remains active but has not yet been assigned to a judge.

Hill recently filed a financial statement related to his request to proceed in forma pauperis, signaling his intention to avoid paying the court’s filing fee due to financial hardship. This procedural step often precedes a court decision on whether to grant fee waiver status.

The case’s underlying claims and causes of action have not been publicly detailed in the docket filings so far. The absence of a judge assignment and limited filings suggest the case is still in its early stages.

The court will next need to decide whether to grant Hill’s in forma pauperis status, which will determine if the case can move forward without immediate payment of fees. Once that decision is made, the court will likely assign a judge and set a schedule for initial pleadings or motions.

Monitoring the court’s ruling on the fee waiver and any subsequent judge assignment will provide the first clear signals of how the case will proceed.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
description
Filing May 12, 2026

2:13-cv-02706 Tony Lee Hill v. City of Torrance California et al

Tony Lee Hill filed a financial entry related to the in forma pauperis (IFP) filing fee in his case against the City of Torrance, California. This filing indicates he is requesting to proceed without paying the standard court fees due to financial hardship. The court will review this to decide if he qualifies for fee waiver.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 hour, 26 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.