Judge Payne grants motion requiring plaintiff to respond or amend complaint by February 6
Case Summary
ORDER that the MOTION (ECF No. 18 ) is granted. It is further ORDERED that: Plaintiff shall respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 13 ) or otherwise amend her complaint pursuant to Rule 15 by February 6, 2026. Defendants shall file their Answers and any other motion respecting an Amended Complaint by February 27, 2026, or file, by February 20, 2026, a reply brief if Plaintiff opposes their Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 1/6/2026. (jenjones, ) (Entered: 01/06/2026)
Latest development
ORDER that the MOTION (ECF No. 18 ) is granted. It is further ORDERED that: Plaintiff shall respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 13 ) or otherwise amend her complaint pursuant to Rule 15 by February 6,
Order · May 10, 2026
February 6 filed an Amended Complaint by February.
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
ORDER that the MOTION (ECF No. 18 ) is granted. It is further ORDERED that: Plaintiff shall respond to Defendants'
Order · May 10, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Presiding Judge
1 linked entity
Judge
Robert E. Payne
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 10, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Robert E. Payne.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
District Judge Robert E. Payne granted a motion on January 6, 2026, setting a schedule for the plaintiff to respond to the defendants' Motion to Dismiss or amend her complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. The plaintiff must file her response or an amended complaint by February 6, 2026.
The defendants have until February 20, 2026, to file a reply brief if the plaintiff opposes their Motion to Dismiss. Alternatively, if the plaintiff files an amended complaint, the defendants must answer or file any motions related to that amended complaint by February 27, 2026.
The order clarifies the procedural timeline after the defendants challenged the sufficiency of the plaintiff's original complaint. The case remains active, but the court has not yet ruled on the merits of the Motion to Dismiss.
The deadlines reflect the court's effort to move the case forward while giving the plaintiff an opportunity to fix any pleading deficiencies. The docket does not specify the nature of the claims or the parties involved. The next key step depends on whether the plaintiff amends the complaint or responds directly to the Motion to Dismiss.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
ORDER that the MOTION (ECF No. 18 ) is granted. It is further ORDERED that: Plaintiff shall respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 13 ) or otherwise amend her complaint pursuant to Rule 15 by February 6, 2026. Defendants shall file their Answers and any other motion respecting an Amended Complaint by February 27, 2026, or file, by February 20, 2026, a reply brief if Plaintiff opposes their Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 1/6/2026. (jenjones, ) (Entered:
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventORDER that the MOTION (ECF No. 18 ) is granted. It is further ORDERED that: Plaintiff shall respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 13 ) or otherwise amend her complaint pursuant to Rule 15 by February 6, 2026. Defendants shall file their Answers and any other motion respecting an Amended Complaint by
February 6 filed an Amended Complaint by February.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
9 hours, 47 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.