ORDER granting 62 . The Court retains jurisdiction to So Order any settlement documents if they are filed by 9/28/2023. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 8/8/2023. (PW)
Case Summary
The court granted motion 62 and retained jurisdiction to approve any settlement documents filed by September 28, 2023. Judge Brian M. Cogan issued the order on August 8, 2023. This indicates the case is moving toward resolution contingent on settlement approval.
Latest development
ORDER granting 62 . The Court retains jurisdiction to So Order any settlement documents if they are filed by 9/28/2023. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 8/8/2023. (PW)
Order · May 11, 2026
Judge Brian issued an order.
Key Issues
- • Settlement approval
- • Court jurisdiction
- • Motion 62
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
ORDER granting 62 . The Court retains jurisdiction to So Order any settlement documents if they are filed by 9/28/2023.
Order · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Presiding Judge
1 linked entity
Judge
Brian M. Cogan
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Brian M. Cogan.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Judge Brian M. Cogan issued an order on August 8, 2023, granting the relief sought in docket entry 62. The court retained jurisdiction to approve any settlement documents related to this case, provided they are filed by September 28, 2023.
This indicates the parties have likely reached or are close to reaching a settlement agreement that requires court approval. The order does not specify the nature of the relief granted or the underlying claims, leaving the case's substantive issues unclear.
The court’s retention of jurisdiction signals that it will oversee the finalization of any settlement to ensure compliance with its terms. The case remains active, but the next significant development hinges on whether the parties submit settlement documents by the court’s deadline.
If they do, the court will review and potentially enter a final order resolving the dispute. If not, the case may proceed on the merits or through other procedural steps. Judge Cogan’s order sets a firm timeline for concluding this phase of the litigation.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
ORDER granting 62 . The Court retains jurisdiction to So Order any settlement documents if they are filed by 9/28/2023. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 8/8/2023. (PW)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventORDER granting 62 . The Court retains jurisdiction to So Order any settlement documents if they are filed by 9/28/2023. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 8/8/2023. (PW)
Judge Brian issued an order.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
5 hours, 21 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.