ORDER granting in part 63 . The parties shall file their settlement documents today, 9/28/2023, as previously ordered. Plaintiff shall file its de-designation motion by 10/16/2023; opposition 10/30/2023; reply 11/6/2023. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 9/28/2023. (PW)
Case Summary
Judge Brian M. Cogan granted in part a motion and ordered the parties to file settlement documents by September 28, 2023. The plaintiff must file a de-designation motion by October 16, 2023, with opposition and reply deadlines set for October 30 and November 6, 2023, respectively.
Latest development
ORDER granting in part 63 . The parties shall file their settlement documents today, 9/28/2023, as previously ordered. Plaintiff shall file its de-designation motion by 10/16/2023; opposition 10/30/2023; reply
Order · May 11, 2026
A Motion was filed.
Key Issues
- • Settlement documents
- • De-designation motion
- • Briefing schedule
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
ORDER granting in part 63 . The parties shall file their settlement documents today, 9/28/2023, as previously ordered.
Order · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Presiding Judge
1 linked entity
Judge
Brian M. Cogan
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Brian M. Cogan.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Judge Brian M. Cogan issued an order on September 28, 2023, granting in part a prior motion labeled 63. The order requires the parties to submit their settlement documents on the same day, adhering to an earlier directive.
The plaintiff must file a motion to de-designate certain materials by October 16, 2023. Opposing parties have until October 30, 2023, to respond, with the plaintiff allowed a reply by November 6, 2023. This schedule sets a clear timeline for resolving disputes over document confidentiality or classification.
The case remains active, but the court has not publicly disclosed the docket number or the court where it is pending. The next procedural steps focus on the de-designation motion, which could affect what information remains under protective order or becomes public.
The settlement documents filing suggests the parties are moving toward resolving some issues outside of trial, but the court’s involvement in the de-designation process indicates ongoing disputes over sensitive materials.
Watch for the plaintiff’s de-designation motion and the subsequent opposition filings, which will clarify the scope of protected information and potentially influence discovery and trial preparation.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
ORDER granting in part 63 . The parties shall file their settlement documents today, 9/28/2023, as previously ordered. Plaintiff shall file its de-designation motion by 10/16/2023; opposition 10/30/2023; reply 11/6/2023. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 9/28/2023. (PW)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventORDER granting in part 63 . The parties shall file their settlement documents today, 9/28/2023, as previously ordered. Plaintiff shall file its de-designation motion by 10/16/2023; opposition 10/30/2023; reply 11/6/2023. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 9/28/2023. (PW)
A Motion was filed.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
6 hours, 25 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.