civil-litigation court-watch

ORDER granting 71 . Defendants' opposition due 11/2/2023; plaintiff's reply due 11/10/2023. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 10/30/2023. (PW)

Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Judge Brian M. Cogan granted an order on October 30, 2023, setting deadlines for defendants' opposition due November 2, 2023, and plaintiff's reply due November 10, 2023. The order relates to motion practice but lacks further substance.

Latest development

ORDER granting 71 . Defendants' opposition due 11/2/2023; plaintiff's reply due 11/10/2023. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 10/30/2023. (PW)

Order · May 11, 2026

Judge Brian issued an order.

Key Issues

  • Motion granted
  • Briefing schedule
  • Judge Brian M. Cogan
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

ORDER granting 71 . Defendants' opposition due 11/2/2023; plaintiff's reply due 11/10/2023. Ordered by Judge Brian M.

Order · May 11, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Presiding Judge

1 linked entity

gavel

Judge

Brian M. Cogan

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Brian M. Cogan.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 9 hours, 41 minutes ago

Judge Brian M. Cogan issued an order on October 30, 2023, granting the motion at docket entry 71. The order sets a briefing schedule requiring the defendants to file their opposition by November 2, 2023.

The plaintiff must submit a reply by November 10, 2023. The case remains active, but the underlying claims, parties, and court are not publicly identified in the docket information. The order signals the court's willingness to move forward with the issues raised in the motion, likely narrowing the dispute or addressing a procedural matter.

The upcoming briefs will clarify the parties' positions and may influence the court’s next steps. Judge Cogan’s management of the schedule suggests a focus on timely resolution. The absence of detailed filings or a public docket number limits insight into the case’s substantive issues.

Watch for the defendants’ opposition filing, which will reveal their response to the motion granted at entry 71. The plaintiff’s reply will follow shortly after, potentially sharpening the legal arguments before the court decides whether to grant further relief or proceed to discovery or trial.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 10 hours ago
Judge Brian issued an order.
receipt_long Source expand_more

ORDER granting 71 . Defendants' opposition due 11/2/2023; plaintiff's reply due 11/10/2023. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 10/30/2023. (PW)

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order May 11, 2026

ORDER granting 71 . Defendants' opposition due 11/2/2023; plaintiff's reply due 11/10/2023. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 10/30/2023. (PW)

Judge Brian issued an order.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

5 hours, 20 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.