ORDER granting 71 . Defendants' opposition due 11/2/2023; plaintiff's reply due 11/10/2023. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 10/30/2023. (PW)
Case Summary
Judge Brian M. Cogan granted an order on October 30, 2023, setting deadlines for defendants' opposition due November 2, 2023, and plaintiff's reply due November 10, 2023. The order relates to motion practice but lacks further substance.
Latest development
ORDER granting 71 . Defendants' opposition due 11/2/2023; plaintiff's reply due 11/10/2023. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 10/30/2023. (PW)
Order · May 11, 2026
Judge Brian issued an order.
Key Issues
- • Motion granted
- • Briefing schedule
- • Judge Brian M. Cogan
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
ORDER granting 71 . Defendants' opposition due 11/2/2023; plaintiff's reply due 11/10/2023. Ordered by Judge Brian M.
Order · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Presiding Judge
1 linked entity
Judge
Brian M. Cogan
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Brian M. Cogan.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Judge Brian M. Cogan issued an order on October 30, 2023, granting the motion at docket entry 71. The order sets a briefing schedule requiring the defendants to file their opposition by November 2, 2023.
The plaintiff must submit a reply by November 10, 2023. The case remains active, but the underlying claims, parties, and court are not publicly identified in the docket information. The order signals the court's willingness to move forward with the issues raised in the motion, likely narrowing the dispute or addressing a procedural matter.
The upcoming briefs will clarify the parties' positions and may influence the court’s next steps. Judge Cogan’s management of the schedule suggests a focus on timely resolution. The absence of detailed filings or a public docket number limits insight into the case’s substantive issues.
Watch for the defendants’ opposition filing, which will reveal their response to the motion granted at entry 71. The plaintiff’s reply will follow shortly after, potentially sharpening the legal arguments before the court decides whether to grant further relief or proceed to discovery or trial.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
ORDER granting 71 . Defendants' opposition due 11/2/2023; plaintiff's reply due 11/10/2023. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 10/30/2023. (PW)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventORDER granting 71 . Defendants' opposition due 11/2/2023; plaintiff's reply due 11/10/2023. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 10/30/2023. (PW)
Judge Brian issued an order.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
5 hours, 20 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.