2:26-cv-05023 CHAVEZ MONROY v. BLANCHE et al
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( 1
A habeas corpus petition was filed in the case of Chavez Monroy v. Blanche et al (2:26-cv-05023) in the US District Court. The petition seeks to challenge the detention or imprisonment of the petitioner, citing alleged constitutional or statutory violations. This filing is a critical step in the habeas corpus process.
Latest development
Filing · May 4, 2026
The court received payment for the filing fee in the case of Chuta-Salazar v. Blanche et al, allowing the petition to proceed. This is a significant development in the case, which is related to the Marroquin v. Blanche et al habeas corpus petition. The payment indicates that the petitioners are moving forward with their case.
description View filingCourt
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:26-cv-05023 CHAVEZ MONROY v. BLANCHE et al
Other · May 04, 2026
Coverage
7 articles
4 sources tracked
Participants
7 Plaintiffs
11 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 04, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes 1:24-cv-00360 Olageshin, 2:26-cv-04993 SANCHEZ CARRILLO, 1:26-cv-04993 SANCHEZ CARRILLO and others.
Press monitoring has found 7 related articles from 4 distinct sources.
Filing Fee/Payment Received
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
A habeas corpus petition was filed in the case of Chavez Monroy v. Blanche et al (2:26-cv-05023) in the US District Court. The petition seeks to challenge the detention or imprisonment of the petitioner, citing alleged constitutional or statutory violations. This filing is a critical step in the habeas corpus process.
The case of Marroquin v. Blanche et al has been assigned to a new judge, Sanchez Carrillo, in the federal court. This means that the case will now be handled by Judge Sanchez Carrillo instead of the previous judge. The assignment of a new judge can impact the progress and outcome of the case.
A habeas corpus petition was filed in the case of Marroquin v. Blanche et al (2:26-cv-04993) in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. The petition seeks a writ of habeas corpus, which is a court order requiring the government to produce the petitioner and show that their detention is lawful. This is a significant development in the case.
An affidavit was filed.
The court has received a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the case of Marroquin v. Blanche et al (2:26-cv-04968 MACIAS CADENA v. BLANCHE et al). This petition seeks to challenge the legality of the petitioner's detention. The court will now review the petition to determine whether the detention is lawful.
The court received payment for the filing fee in the case of Chuta-Salazar v. Blanche et al, allowing the petition to proceed. This is a significant development in the case, which is related to the Marroquin v. Blanche et al habeas corpus petition. The payment indicates that the petitioners are moving forward with their case.
The plaintiff, Marroquin, filed a complaint for a writ of habeas corpus in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, seeking to challenge their detention. The writ is a legal action that requires the government to justify the reason for the detention. This filing marks the beginning of the habeas corpus process.
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( 1
Case Assigned/Reassigned
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( 1
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( 1
Filing Fee/Payment Received
Application/Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( 1
Sources tracked
4 outlets · 7 articles
Timeline events
7 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 8 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.