newspaper
legal-news
Nwosu v. Mullin et al
26-cv-23149
D. Mass.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
The court granted a motion to consolidate the case of Nwosu v. Mullin et al with 1:26-cv-05238 Briggs et al v. Mullin et al. This means that the two cases will now be heard together, potentially streamlining the litigation process. The consolidation will likely impact the parties involved, including Nwosu and the defendants.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
D. Mass.
District of Massachusetts · 1st Circuit · MA
tag
Docket
Not captured
Civil
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
1:26-cv-05238 Briggs et al v. Mullin et al
Other · May 06, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
10 articles
6 sources tracked
groups
Participants
7 Plaintiffs
12 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of Massachusetts, a federal district court in MA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 06, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes 2:26-cv-05004 ALFARO NEVADO, 3:26-cv-03238 SANDOVAL ESPINOZA, 2:26-cv-04820 De Macedo Kolczycki and others.
Press monitoring has found 10 related articles from 6 distinct sources.
About This Court
District of Massachusetts (D. Mass.) is a federal district court in the 1st Circuit, MA.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
10 events
info
Other
May 6, 2026
1:26-cv-05238 Briggs et al v. Mullin et al
The court granted a motion to consolidate the case of Nwosu v. Mullin et al with 1:26-cv-05238 Briggs et al v. Mullin et al. This means that the two cases will now be heard together, potentially streamlining the litigation process. The consolidation will likely impact the parties involved, including Nwosu and the defendants.
info
Other
May 5, 2026
1:26-cv-12052 SAIFI v. MULLIN et al
The plaintiff, SAIFI, filed a Civil Cover Sheet and Category Sheet in the case of Nwosu v. Mullin et al, indicating the commencement of a new lawsuit. This filing is a procedural step in the litigation process, providing essential information about the case. The significance of this event lies in its indication of the start of a new lawsuit.
info
Other
May 5, 2026
1:26-cv-12051 De Oliveira Caetano v. MULLIN et al
The court has received a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the case of De Oliveira Caetano v. Mullin et al (1:26-cv-12051). This petition seeks to challenge the detention of the petitioner, De Oliveira Caetano, and is a separate case from Nwosu v. Mullin et al. The petition is filed under 2241, a federal statute governing habeas corpus petitions.
info
Other
May 5, 2026
0:26-cv-61345 de leon mazariegos v. Mullin et al
A new case, de Leon Mazariegos v. Mullin et al, was filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, seeking a writ of habeas corpus. This filing is a separate case from Nwosu v. Mullin et al, indicating a new plaintiff and potentially new claims. The writ of habeas corpus is a legal action that challenges the legality of a person's detention.
info
Other
May 5, 2026
1:26-cv-12043 Caba Francisco v. Mullin et al
The court mailed a copy of the case Caba Francisco v. Mullin et al to the parties involved. This action is likely a procedural step in the case, possibly related to service of process or notification of a court order. The exact reason for the mailing is not specified.
info
Other
May 4, 2026
2:26-cv-04820 De Macedo Kolczycki v. MULLIN et al
A Summons was issued.
info
Other
May 4, 2026
3:26-cv-03238 SANDOVAL ESPINOZA v. MULLIN et al
The court has consolidated the case of Nwosu v. Mullin et al with another case, 3:26-cv-03238 SANDOVAL ESPINOZA v. MULLIN et al. This consolidation will allow the court to manage multiple related cases together. The consolidation may streamline the litigation process and reduce costs for the parties involved.
info
Other
May 4, 2026
2:25-cv-00935 Dertyshnikov v. Mullin et al
A Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel was filed.
info
Other
May 4, 2026
2:26-cv-05004 ALFARO NEVADO v. MULLIN et al
A petition for a writ of habeas corpus was filed in the case of Nwosu v. Mullin et al, seeking to challenge the detention of a prisoner. The petition was filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of California. This development is significant because it may lead to a review of the prisoner's detention and potentially impact their freedom.
info
Other
May 4, 2026
1:26-cv-23149 Nwosu v. Mullin et al
Nwosu filed a complaint for a writ of habeas corpus in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida. This means Nwosu is challenging the legality of their detention or imprisonment. The court will review the complaint to determine if Nwosu's detention is lawful.
Loading more events...
Advertisement
newspaper
10 articles
Press Coverage
newspaper
1:26-cv-12052 SAIFI v. MULLIN et al
Civil Cover Sheet & Category Sheet ( 3
May 5, 2026
1 min read
newspaper
1:26-cv-12051 De Oliveira Caetano v. MULLIN et al
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241 ( 1
May 5, 2026
1 min read
newspaper
0:26-cv-61345 de leon mazariegos v. Mullin et al
Application/Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( 1
May 5, 2026
1 min read
newspaper
newspaper
2:26-cv-04820 De Macedo Kolczycki v. MULLIN et al
Summons Request ( 3
May 4, 2026
1 min read
newspaper
newspaper
2:25-cv-00935 Dertyshnikov v. Mullin et al
Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel ( 19
May 4, 2026
1 min read
newspaper
2:26-cv-05004 ALFARO NEVADO v. MULLIN et al
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( 1
May 4, 2026
1 min read
newspaper
1:26-cv-23149 Nwosu v. Mullin et al
Application/Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( 1
May 4, 2026
1 min read
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
6 outlets · 10 articles
Timeline events
10 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 9 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.