2:26-cv-04823 Zuniga v. Eight Sleep, Inc.
Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) ( 4
The court has received a Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) in the case of Zuniga v. Eight Sleep, Inc. (2:26-cv-04823). This document is a standard form used to provide basic information about the case. The filing of this document is a procedural step in the case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:26-cv-04823 Zuniga v. Eight Sleep, Inc.
Other · May 05, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Eight Sleep, Inc, 1:26-cv-04823 INTRIAGO ALVARADO and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
The court has received a Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) in the case of Zuniga v. Eight Sleep, Inc. (2:26-cv-04823). This document is a standard form used to provide basic information about the case. The filing of this document is a procedural step in the case.
Intriajo Alvarado filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) on January 26, 2023, in case 1:26-cv-04823. This petition seeks to challenge the legality of Alvarado's detention. The court will now review the petition to determine whether Alvarado's detention is lawful.
Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) ( 4
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( 1
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 7 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.