2:25-cv-10766 Cristina Warnars v. Frank Bisignano
Brief (non-motion non-appeal) ( 14
A Brief (non-motion non-appeal) was filed in the case of Deborah Esther Nayar v. Frank Bisignano. The filing is 14 pages long. The court is the Central District of California with docket number 25-cv-11373. This filing represents a substantive legal argument or statement submitted to the court. As it is not a motion or appeal, it likely pertains to ongoing case proceedings or evidence presentation.
Latest development
Appeal · May 8, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingCourt
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Appeal in progress
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:25-cv-10766 Cristina Warnars v. Frank Bisignano
Appeal · May 08, 2026
Coverage
7 articles
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 7 Plaintiffs
8 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a appeal dated May 08, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Frank Bisignano, 2:25-cv-09420 Dora Jean Teague, 2:25-cv-11683 Michael Shawn Murphy and others.
Press monitoring has found 7 related articles from 1 distinct source.
Deborah Esther Nayar v. Frank Bisignano is an active appellate matter in Central District of California under docket 25-cv-11373.
The dispute currently identifies 2:25-cv-04391 Mario Antonio Ruiz, 2:25-cv-08565 Robert William Lucas, and 2:25-cv-09420 Dora Jean Teague on one side and Frank Bisignano on the other. The case is currently organized around Current docket activity and next procedural step, Appellate posture and standard of review, Issues preserved for appellate review, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 8, 2026, the docket recorded a appeal: A Motion was filed. On May 7, 2026, the docket recorded a other: 2:25-cv-04391 Mario Antonio Ruiz v. Frank Bisignano.
On May 7, 2026, the docket recorded a other: 2:25-cv-09420 Dora Jean Teague v. On May 6, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Notice of Report and Recommendation was filed.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest appeal produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Brief (non-motion non-appeal) ( 14
Open original open_in_newBrief (non-motion non-appeal) ( 19
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
A Motion was filed.
A Motion was filed.
2:25-cv-04391 Mario Antonio Ruiz v. Frank Bisignano.
2:25-cv-09420 Dora Jean Teague v. Frank Bisignano.
A Notice of Report and Recommendation was filed.
Deborah Esther Nayar has been granted an extension of time to file a document in the case 2:25-cv-11373. This means she now has more time to prepare and submit the required document. The extension is likely to give her a chance to gather necessary information or resolve any issues that were holding her back.
The court granted an extension of time for Juan Palacios to file a document in the case 2:25-cv-12216. This means Palacios now has more time to submit the required document. The extension is relevant to the ongoing case.
Brief (non-motion non-appeal) ( 14
Brief (non-motion non-appeal) ( 19
Award of EAJA Fees ( 18
Extension of Time to File Document ( 18
Notice of Report and Recommendation ( 20
Extension of Time to File Document ( 15
Extension of Time to File Document ( 10
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 7 articles
Timeline events
7 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 1 hour ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.