Jose Luis Acosta v. Frank J. Bisginano
Case Summary
The court has been informed of a related case, Vanya Sabrina Posada v. Frank Bisignano, with docket number 2:25-cv-04674. This case is likely connected to the original case, Jose Luis Acosta v. Frank J. Bisginano. The exact nature of the connection is unclear.
Latest development
5:25-cv-02427 Joshua Raketich v. Frank Bisignano
Appeal · May 5, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Current docket activity and next procedural step
- • Issues preserved for appellate review
- • Appellate posture and standard of review
- • Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement
Docket Snapshot
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Appellate
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:25-cv-04674 Vanya Sabrina Posada v. Frank Bisignano
Other · May 05, 2026
Coverage
4 articles
1 source tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 4 Plaintiffs
6 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Frank J. Bisginano, Frank Bisignano, 5:25-cv-02756 Jose Luis Acosta and others.
Press monitoring has found 4 related articles from 1 distinct source.
The Story So Far
Jose Luis Acosta v. Frank J. Bisginano is an active appellate matter in Central District of California under docket 25-cv-02756.
The dispute currently identifies 2:25-cv-04674 Vanya Sabrina Posada, 2:25-cv-09212 Jaqueline Hernandez-Salcedo, and 5:25-cv-02427 Joshua Raketich on one side and Frank Bisignano and Frank J. Bisginano on the other.
The case is currently organized around Current docket activity and next procedural step, Issues preserved for appellate review, Appellate posture and standard of review, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court has been informed of a related case, Vanya Sabrina Posada v. Frank Bisignano, with docket number 2:25-cv-04674. This case is likely connected to the original case, Jose Luis Acosta v. Bisginano. The exact nature of the connection is unclear. On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a appeal: A Motion was filed.
On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court awarded EAJA fees to Jaqueline Hernandez-Salcedo in the amount of $18, in the case 2:25-cv-09212. This award is a result of a previous court decision. The award of EAJA fees is significant because it reimburses the plaintiff for costs associated.
On May 4, 2026, the docket recorded a order: The court issued an order.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Brief (non-motion non-appeal) ( 21
Open original open_in_newreceipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Order to Show Cause ( 13
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
4 events2:25-cv-04674 Vanya Sabrina Posada v. Frank Bisignano
The court has been informed of a related case, Vanya Sabrina Posada v. Frank Bisignano, with docket number 2:25-cv-04674. This case is likely connected to the original case, Jose Luis Acosta v. Frank J. Bisginano. The exact nature of the connection is unclear.
5:25-cv-02427 Joshua Raketich v. Frank Bisignano
A Motion was filed.
2:25-cv-09212 Jaqueline Hernandez-Salcedo v. Frank Bisignano
The court awarded EAJA fees to Jaqueline Hernandez-Salcedo in the amount of $18, in the case 2:25-cv-09212. This award is a result of a previous court decision. The award of EAJA fees is significant because it reimburses the plaintiff for costs associated with the litigation.
5:25-cv-02756 Jose Luis Acosta v. Frank J. Bisginano
The court issued an order.
Press Coverage
5:25-cv-02427 Joshua Raketich v. Frank Bisignano
Brief (non-motion non-appeal) ( 21
2:25-cv-09212 Jaqueline Hernandez-Salcedo v. Frank Bisignano
Award of EAJA Fees ( 18
5:25-cv-02756 Jose Luis Acosta v. Frank J. Bisginano
Order to Show Cause ( 13
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 4 articles
Timeline events
4 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 14 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.