2:25-cv-11254 Elizabeth L. Covington v. Frank Bisignano
Brief (non-motion non-appeal) ( 16
The court awarded EAJA fees to Riazona Heng in the amount of $17_approved, which means Heng will receive reimbursement for her legal expenses. This decision is significant because it allows Heng to recover costs associated with her lawsuit. The award of EAJA fees is a common practice in federal courts.
Latest development
Appeal · May 1, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingCourt
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Appeal in progress
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:25-cv-11254 Elizabeth L. Covington v. Frank Bisignano
Appeal · May 01, 2026
Coverage
5 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 1 Government Agency, 5 Plaintiffs
8 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a appeal dated May 01, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Frank Bisignano, 5:25-cv-01643 Liza J. Perez Cintron and others.
Press monitoring has found 5 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
Brief (non-motion non-appeal) ( 16
Open original open_in_newBrief (non-motion non-appeal) ( 20
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
A Motion was filed.
The court awarded EAJA fees to Riazona Heng in the amount of $17_approved, which means Heng will receive reimbursement for her legal expenses. This decision is significant because it allows Heng to recover costs associated with her lawsuit. The award of EAJA fees is a common practice in federal courts.
A Motion was filed.
The parties filed a joint status report.
The magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation in the case of Liza J. Perez Cintron v. Frank Bisignano, case number 5:25-cv-01643. This report outlines the magistrate's findings and recommendations for the court's consideration. The report is now in the hands of the district judge, who will review and decide on the next steps.
Brief (non-motion non-appeal) ( 16
Award of EAJA Fees ( 17
Brief (non-motion non-appeal) ( 20
Status Report ( 61
Report and Recommendation (Issued) ( 17
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 5 articles
Timeline events
5 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 3 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.