CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties.

This civil case is currently active but lacks a designated district judge. The court has issued a clerk's notice under Local Rule 73.1(b), informing the parties that a United States Magistrate Judge is available to oversee all proceedings. This includes pretrial matters, trial, entry of final judgment, and post-trial motions.

The notice requires all parties to consent in writing to have the magistrate judge exercise full jurisdiction over the case. The consent must be unanimous and submitted on a specific form attached to the notice.

Alternatively, the parties may express their consent through joint filings such as a Joint Initial Status Report or a proposed Case Management Order. No docket number or filing date is currently available, and no judge has been assigned to the case.

The clerk’s notice signals the court’s readiness to proceed efficiently if the parties agree to magistrate judge jurisdiction. Without consent, the case will remain under the district court’s control, which may delay scheduling and resolution.

The next procedural steps hinge on whether the parties file the required consent forms or include consent language in their joint submissions. The court’s order dated May 13, 2026, entered judgment, but details of that judgment and its impact on the case status are not provided.

This case remains in a preliminary phase regarding judicial assignment and procedural management.