Clerk’s notice issued on magistrate judge consent under Local Rule 73.1(b)
Case Summary
The court issued a clerk's notice under Local Rule 73.1(b) informing parties that a magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil case. The notice requires all parties to consent in writing for the magistrate judge to handle trial and post-trial matters.
Latest development
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United
Order · May 11, 2026
The court entered judgment.
Key Issues
- • Magistrate judge consent
- • Local Rule 73.1(b)
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct
Order · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
The court has issued a clerk's notice under Local Rule 73.1(b) informing the parties that a United States Magistrate Judge is available to handle all proceedings in this civil case. This includes pretrial matters, trial, entry of final judgment, and any post-trial proceedings.
The notice requires all parties to unanimously consent in writing to have the assigned magistrate judge exercise full jurisdiction over the case. The consent must be documented on a specific form attached to the notice or included in a joint filing such as a Joint Initial Status Report or a proposed Case Management Order.
Without unanimous consent, the case will proceed before a district judge as usual. No judge has been assigned yet, and the docket number and court remain unspecified. The case is active but at an early stage, with the clerk's notice serving as a procedural prompt for the parties to consider magistrate judge jurisdiction.
The notice reflects standard practice under the federal rules to allow magistrate judges to relieve district judges of caseload and expedite proceedings when parties agree. The court awaits the parties' response to this invitation before moving forward with scheduling or substantive rulings.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. T
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventCLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final
The court entered judgment.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
24 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.