civil-litigation government-litigation court-watch

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties.

Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court issued a clerk's notice informing parties of the option to consent to a United States Magistrate Judge conducting all proceedings in the civil case. All parties must sign a consent form for the magistrate judge to handle trial, judgment, and post-trial matters. The form is valid only if all parties agree.

Latest development

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United

Order · May 10, 2026

The court entered judgment.

Key Issues

  • Magistrate judge consent
  • Civil case proceedings
  • Trial and judgment authority
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct

Order · May 11, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

Parties not parsed yet

0 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.

Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 10 hours, 47 minutes ago

This case is currently before a United States District Court, but no district judge has been assigned yet. The clerk issued a notice under Local Rule 73.1(b) informing the parties that a United States Magistrate Judge is available to handle all proceedings in the case. This includes pretrial matters, trial, entry of final judgment, and post-trial motions.

The notice requires all parties to unanimously consent in writing to have the magistrate judge exercise full jurisdiction. The consent must be documented on a specific form attached to the notice or included in a joint filing such as a Joint Initial Status Report or a proposed Case Management Order.

Until all parties sign the consent form, the case will remain under the district court's standard assignment procedures. The docket does not show any filings indicating that the parties have agreed to magistrate judge jurisdiction.

The clerk's notice serves as a procedural step to inform the parties of their option to streamline the case by consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction. This option can speed up proceedings by avoiding the need to assign a district judge and can allow the magistrate judge to issue final rulings without district court review.

The case remains active with no substantive rulings or motions filed to date. The court has not set a schedule or assigned a judge, leaving the case in a preliminary posture. The parties must decide whether to consent to the magistrate judge or await assignment of a district judge.

The clerk's notice is a routine administrative step in federal civil litigation to help case management and judicial efficiency.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 11 hours ago
The court entered judgment.
receipt_long Source expand_more

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. T

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order May 10, 2026

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final

The court entered judgment.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 hour, 35 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.