Browse Cases

Western District of Washington

A declaration was filed in Dawson et al. v. Porch.com Inc in the Western District of Washington. The declaration likely presents factual assertions supporting the plaintiffs' claims. The case involves multiple plaintiffs and proceeds through civil litigation stages.

Western District of Washington

ICE agent Gregory Donnell Morgan Jr. faces two counts of second-degree aggravated assault in connection with an incident during a traffic stop in Minneapolis. The charges stem from allegations that the agent pointed his gun at individuals in a vehicle on February 5. The Hennepin County Attorney's Office filed the

District of Delaware

Watson Guide IP, LLC served a notice in a patent case against 360 Imaging, LLC in the District of Delaware. The notice formally informs the defendant of the legal action. The case centers on intellectual property rights, though further details are not provided.

District of Delaware

The District of Delaware court scheduled hearings in a patent dispute between Aytu BioPharma, Inc. and Granules Pharmaceuticals Inc. The hearings likely concern patent validity, infringement, or related procedural issues. The case involves complex intellectual property litigation.

District of Colorado

Parker filed a civil lawsuit against TTEC Holdings, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. The available information does not specify the claims or issues involved. The case is in its early stages with limited public details.

District of Colorado

The District of Colorado court issued an order on a motion in limine in McKeon v. Aaran Transport, LLC. The order addresses the admissibility of evidence or limits on trial issues to streamline the upcoming trial. Such rulings shape the evidentiary framework and can significantly impact trial strategy.

District of Colorado

The District of Colorado court issued a minute order in Johnson v. City of Westminster, a civil lawsuit. The order likely addresses procedural matters such as scheduling or motions but does not reveal substantive rulings or case developments. The case continues through the federal civil process.

Central District of California

Apogee Law Group P.C. served documents to Holly Ying Li in a civil case filed in the Central District of California. The service of documents marks a procedural step toward advancing the litigation. The nature of the documents and claims remain unspecified in the available information.

District of Colorado

USAA Casualty Insurance Company removed the Mears case from state court to the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. The removal indicates the defendant invoked federal jurisdiction, likely based on diversity or federal question grounds. The case now proceeds under federal procedural rules, which

District of Massachusetts

USA v. Fuhrmann, docket 25-cr-10066 in the District of Massachusetts, shows no recent docket activity or filings. The case remains open with no public updates on motions, hearings, or trial dates. The matter involves federal criminal charges.

District of New Jersey

Magana-Herrera filed a civil rights petition against the Warden of FCI Fort Dix in the District of New Jersey, docket 25-cv-05848. The case involves conditions of confinement or related prison administration issues. No recent docket activity or rulings have been recorded to date.

District of Massachusetts

USA v. Mejia is an ongoing criminal case in the District of Massachusetts. Details on recent filings or rulings are not provided, but the docket indicates active federal prosecution.

Chief Judge Sara Darrow reassigned the case to Judge Michael M. Mihm on March 26, 2025, citing the nature of the case as the reason. The reassignment directs further proceedings under Judge Mihm's supervision.

The court set the deadline for defendant Kasturi Kripakaran to file an answer by May 27, 2025. This scheduling order is a standard procedural step.

The court set or reset the deadline for defendant Michael Gadson to file his answer by May 27, 2025. This deadline setting is part of routine case scheduling.

Chief Judge Sara Darrow referred the case and related hearings to Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Hanna for further proceedings on May 15, 2025. This reassignment signals a shift to magistrate-level management of pretrial matters.

Judge Michael M. Mihm granted defendant Kripakaran's unopposed motion to dismiss on June 10, 2025, and ordered the clerk to terminate Kripakaran from the case. The court also granted an unopposed extension of time for defendants Broyles, Fitz, and Treanor to file responsive pleadings, now due June 26, 2025.

Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Hanna granted defendant Gadson's unopposed motion for extension of time on June 12, 2025. Gadson's responsive pleading deadline was extended to July 2, 2025, despite the motion being filed after the original deadline elapsed. The court reminded parties that deadlines are mandatory.

Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Hanna granted the unopposed motion for a protective order by defendants Broyles, Fitz, and Treanor on July 2, 2025. The court ordered the proposed protective order to be entered following the text order.

Judge Michael M. Mihm granted unopposed motions to dismiss filed by defendants Broyles, Fitz, Treanor, and Gadson on July 15, 2025. The court dismissed all claims without prejudice and ordered the clerk to enter judgment accordingly.