Browse Cases

Northern District of Illinois

Smith v. Wigman et al, 23-cv-50105, is a newly filed civil case in the Northern District of Illinois. Public records provide no substantive or procedural updates yet. The case's nature and claims remain unclear pending further filings or court orders.

Northern District of Illinois

The Northern District of Illinois permitted an attorney to withdraw in Ball-Wallace v. Estes Express Lines, 25-cv-09445. This procedural order affects client representation and may influence case management or strategy. No substantive case details are provided.

Northern District of Illinois

The Northern District of Illinois ruled on a motion to dismiss in Gabay v. LyondellBasell Industries N.V., 25-cv-08237. The court evaluated whether the plaintiff's complaint states sufficient legal grounds to proceed. This ruling is a critical early test of the complaint's viability in the civil litigation process.

Northern District of Illinois

The Northern District of Illinois docket 23-cv-01148 reflects an appellate mandate issued in PNC Bank v. TSG II Investments, LLC. The mandate indicates completion of appellate review, which may resolve or advance the underlying financial dispute. The case involves banking and investment parties, suggesting complex

Northern District of Illinois

Ingram et al v. NewRez, LLC, 26-cv-60712, saw new counsel enter the case in the Northern District of Illinois. The notice of attorney appearance signals a procedural development that often precedes substantive motions or discovery activity. No further details on claims or issues are currently available.

Northern District of Illinois

The Northern District of Illinois granted an extension of time in Borroto et al v. Southwest Airlines Co., 25-cv-61409. This procedural order allows one or more parties additional time to meet court deadlines, potentially impacting case scheduling and strategy. The underlying claims and issues remain unspecified in

Northern District of Illinois

The Northern District of Illinois ruled on a motion to amend the complaint in Jimenez v. Federal Express Corporation, 26-cv-02690. The court's decision determines whether the plaintiff can expand or correct claims, affecting the litigation's scope and potential defenses. The case involves a dispute between an

Central District of California

In the case of Michel Desta v. Wins Finance Holdings Inc. et al, the plaintiff Michel Desta initiated litigation against Wins Finance Holdings Inc. and associated parties. The case docket number is 17-cv-02983. While specific details of the claims are not provided, the case involves procedural matters related to the

Central District of California

In the case 2:25-cv-10432 Andrew Left et al v. Anson Funds Management LP et al, plaintiffs Andrew Left and others have initiated litigation against Anson Funds Management LP and additional defendants. The case involves a dispute likely centered on financial or investment matters, given the parties involved, though

Central District of California

In the case 2:24-cv-08715 Veronica Paz Aguilar et al v. Catherine L. Jacobs et al, the plaintiffs have filed a motion for leave to appear, indicating procedural developments in ongoing litigation. The case involves multiple parties, with Veronica Paz Aguilar and others as plaintiffs and Catherine L. Jacobs and others

Central District of California

The case titled Joshua Risley v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints et al, docket number 25-cv-02249, involves a legal dispute between the plaintiff, Joshua Risley, and the defendant, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints along with other parties. Although specific details of the claims are not

Central District of California

The case titled 2:25-cv-06583 N. M. v. Walter Carpio et al involves a legal dispute between the plaintiff, N. M., and the defendants, including Walter Carpio. The docket entry referenced pertains to a procedural utility motion seeking to terminate deadlines and hearings, indicating ongoing case management activities.

District of Colorado

In the case 1:22-cv-00720 Western Gravel Constructors, LLC v. Jita Contracting, Inc. et al, Western Gravel Constructors initiated legal action against Jita Contracting and other defendants. The case involves a dispute likely related to contractual or business dealings between the parties. A minute order was issued

District of Colorado

In the case Illinois Casualty Company v. Orozco et al, docket number 1:25-cv-02806, the parties are involved in a dispute that has reached the stage of summary judgment. The plaintiff, Illinois Casualty Company, likely seeks a judicial determination on the merits of its claims without proceeding to a full trial. The

District of Colorado

In the case 1:14-cv-02887 Menocal et al v. The GEO Group, Inc., the plaintiffs brought a lawsuit against The GEO Group, Inc., a private prison company. The docket entry referenced is an order granting a motion for an extension of time to file a response or reply, indicating ongoing procedural developments in the

District of Colorado

In the case 1:24-cv-03139 Cordova v. South Metro Fire Rescue Fire Protection District et al, the plaintiff, Cordova, has brought a legal action against the South Metro Fire Rescue Fire Protection District and other defendants. The case docket indicates a minute order was issued, but specific details regarding the

Central District of California

In the case 2:24-cv-08671 Weijie Xu v. Chenshi Zhuang et al, the primary issue involves a dispute over attorney fees. The parties are engaged in litigation where the allocation or awarding of attorney fees has become a contested matter. The case is currently pending in an unspecified court, with docket entries

District of Colorado

In the case 1:22-cv-02285 Harvest Worship Center v. Resound Church, the court addressed a motion to amend, correct, or modify a prior order or pleading. The motion sought to adjust certain aspects of the case record or procedural posture, reflecting the parties' ongoing efforts to clarify or update the issues before

District of Colorado

In the case 1:24-cv-03461 Mahalingam v. Colorado State University, the plaintiff initiated a lawsuit against Colorado State University. The case docket indicates a motion or order to dismiss was filed, suggesting that the court may have considered terminating the case without proceeding to trial. Specific details

Central District of California

In the case of Michael Feldman v. Venture Agency Holdings, Inc. et al, docket number 23-cv-08951, the parties are engaged in litigation involving claims brought by Michael Feldman against Venture Agency Holdings and other defendants. The case has progressed to a motion hearing stage, indicating ongoing procedural