Browse Cases

Central District of California

In the case 5:21-cv-00877 Natalie Panossian-Bassler v. City of Murrieta, et al, the plaintiff, Natalie Panossian-Bassler, brought a lawsuit against the City of Murrieta and other defendants. The case involves a procedural motion concerning the striking of electronically filed documents, as indicated by docket entry

District of Colorado

In the case 1:26-cv-21897, Concept Boats, Inc. and Double E. Investment Group, Inc. filed a lawsuit against Ace American Insurance Company. The dispute involved claims presumably related to insurance coverage or contractual obligations, although specific details of the claims are not provided. The parties have since

Northern District of Illinois

Kurschner filed an amended complaint against Mireles and others in the Northern District of Illinois. The amendment suggests efforts to clarify or strengthen claims amid ongoing litigation. Details on the underlying dispute are limited but the case remains active.

Northern District of Illinois

Netvue Technologies Co. Ltd. filed an amended complaint against Gooding Store and others in the Northern District of Illinois. The amendment refines or expands claims, possibly related to intellectual property or commercial disputes. The case remains in an active pleading phase.

Northern District of Illinois

The United States obtained a judgment on the pleadings against unauthorized electronic nicotine delivery products in the Northern District of Illinois. The case involves regulatory enforcement and product seizure without a full trial. The ruling resolves legal arguments based on submitted pleadings alone.

Northern District of Illinois

Boykins v. Dortch et al is an active civil case in the Northern District of Illinois involving multiple defendants. Specific claims are not detailed, but the case likely concerns contractual or tort disputes. The litigation is ongoing without public updates on motions or rulings.

Northern District of Illinois

The Federal Trade Commission filed a motion for extension of time in its enforcement action against ACIA17 Automotive, Inc. in the Northern District of Illinois. The case involves regulatory challenges to the defendant’s business practices. The extension request signals ongoing procedural activity in the civil

Western District of Washington

In Barber v. State of Washington, the plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the Western District of Washington. This motion seeks court permission to waive fees due to financial hardship. The case appears to be in its initial stages with no substantive rulings yet.

Western District of Washington

The Western District of Washington closed case 26-cv-05362 without any substantive proceedings. The case was dismissed or terminated at an early stage with no claims or details disclosed. The closure likely resulted from voluntary dismissal, settlement, or administrative reasons.

Western District of Washington

Saunders v. Shein Distribution Corp. was terminated in the Western District of Washington. The termination, indicated by an AO 121 form, signals closure of the case by settlement, dismissal, or other procedural means. No further litigation is expected in this matter.

Western District of Washington

The judge in 700 Edgewater Development, LLC v. Zurich American Insurance Company recused from the case in the Western District of Washington. The recusal likely stems from a conflict of interest or impartiality concern. The case will be reassigned to a different judge for further proceedings.

Western District of Washington

The Western District of Washington dismissed United National Insurance Company v. Joe Tex Xpress LLC as a duplicate of case 5122. A stipulation of dismissal was filed, confirming the resolution of the dispute between the parties. The dismissal ends all claims in this docket without further litigation.

Southern District of New York

In the case Brent v. My Goals Solutions Inc., docket number 25-cv-03584, the parties are engaged in litigation involving claims brought by Brent against My Goals Solutions Inc. The case details are limited, with the available document being a letter filed in the court record. Without additional substantive filings or

Southern District of New York

The case titled Dharry v. 60th Street, LLC et al, docket number 25-cv-06734, involves a dispute between the plaintiff, Dharry, and the defendant, 60th Street, LLC, along with other parties. While specific facts of the case are not detailed, the filing of a Proposed Case Management Plan indicates that the parties are

Southern District of New York

The case 1:22-cv-10625 Reif et al v. Republic of Austria et al involves plaintiffs Reif and others filing a lawsuit against the Republic of Austria and additional defendants. The docket includes a letter filed as document number 165, though specific details about the claims or procedural posture are not provided in

Southern District of New York

In the case titled The National Retirement Fund et al v. Domestic Linen Control Group, the plaintiffs, represented by the National Retirement Fund and associated parties, brought suit against Domestic Linen Control Group. The dispute centers on issues related to contractual obligations and financial responsibilities

Western District of Washington

The case titled Little Beings Holdings Pty Ltd et al v. SQE Incorporated, docket number 25-cv-02730, involves a dispute between the plaintiffs, Little Beings Holdings Pty Ltd and others, and the defendant, SQE Incorporated. While specific details of the claims are not provided, the presence of a consent letter and

Western District of Washington

In the case titled Katrinssonr et al v. State of Washington Department of Corrections et al, the plaintiffs have filed objections to a Report and Recommendation issued by the court. While specific details of the underlying claims are not provided, the objections indicate a procedural step in which the parties

Western District of Washington

The case 3:25-cv-05410 Barton v. Perkins involves a civil dispute between the parties Barton and Perkins. While specific details of the claims are not provided, the docket indicates ongoing proceedings in a federal court, with recent supplemental filings submitted to the court. The nature of the dispute and the relief

Western District of Washington

The case 3:26-cv-05333 Washington Wildlife First et al v. Susewind et al involves plaintiffs Washington Wildlife First and others bringing claims against defendants including Susewind. The docket references a Corporate/Diversity Disclosure Statement, which is a procedural filing typically required to inform the court