Browse Cases

Central District of California

In the case of Lafonzo Turner v. Duke et al, filed under docket number 23-cv-03204, the plaintiff, Lafonzo Turner, has brought a legal action against the defendants identified as Duke and others. The case involves a motion filed by one party, to which the opposing party has submitted a formal response in opposition

District of New Jersey

The case titled NJ Building Laborers Statewide Benefit Funds and the Trustees Thereof v. Industrial Construction of New Jersey, Inc., et al., involves a dispute brought by the NJ Building Laborers Statewide Benefit Funds and their trustees against Industrial Construction of New Jersey, Inc. and other defendants. While

Northern District of California

The case 3:23-cv-03755 Lovette v. CCFI Companies LLC involves a dispute between the plaintiff, Lovette, and the defendant, CCFI Companies LLC. Specific details of the claims or allegations have not been provided, but the docket references an errata filing, indicating a correction or amendment to previous court

Northern District of California

The case 5:24-cv-06993 (K.R.D.) v. Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. et al involves litigation between the plaintiff, identified as K.R.D., and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. along with other defendants. The docket indicates the filing of a status report, which typically provides the court with updates on case progress

Northern District of California

In the case 3:25-cv-04570 Aretis Limited v. Oakever Games Pte. Ltd., the court issued an order on the report and recommendations related to the dispute between the parties. While specific factual details are limited, the order likely addresses procedural or substantive issues raised in prior filings or motions

Southern District of Florida

In the case titled Barberi v. JVL Dental Creations P.A. et al, docket number 1:26-cv-20885, the parties have filed a motion seeking an extension of time to file a response, reply, or answer. The case details and court are not specified, but the procedural motion indicates ongoing litigation requiring additional time

Southern District of Florida

In the case 1:26-cv-20916 Dominguez v. Delices De France Inc et al, the parties have consented to jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge. This procedural development indicates that the parties agreed to have the magistrate judge oversee the case, which can streamline proceedings and potentially expedite

Central District of California

In the case of Jaime Cummings v. Uplight, Inc. et al, docket number 2:25-cv-05332, the plaintiff Jaime Cummings has initiated legal proceedings against Uplight, Inc. and other defendants. The case involves procedural matters related to setting or resetting hearings, as indicated by the recent docket entry. Specific

Central District of California

In the civil case Terence D. Davis v. General Atomics, a sanctions motion has been filed, indicating a dispute over potential misconduct or procedural violations during litigation. While specific details of the sanctions motion are not provided, such motions typically arise when a party believes the opposing side has

Central District of California

Gary Schettini has filed a civil lawsuit against Rain Bird Corporation under docket number 25-cv-11958. The case involves a dispute between Schettini and Rain Bird, with recent filings including a memorandum in opposition to a motion, indicating ongoing litigation activities. While specific factual details and claims

District of New Jersey

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania filed a lawsuit against Exxon Mobil Corporation and other defendants under docket number 14-cv-06228. Although specific allegations are not detailed, the case likely involves claims related to corporate conduct, potentially addressing issues such as environmental impact, regulatory

Central District of California

This case involves a search warrant issued under docket number 26-mj-08282 in a matter titled USA v. SEALED. The warrant includes a delayed notification provision, meaning that law enforcement was authorized to conduct a search without immediately informing the subject of the warrant.

District of New Jersey

In the case titled Dora Gloria Montoya Fernandez v. Tesla, Inc. et al, docket number 25-cv-05278, the plaintiff brought claims against Tesla, Inc. and possibly other defendants. The case was filed in an unspecified court. A motion or order to dismiss the case was filed, indicating that the court or parties sought to

Central District of California

In the case titled DOE v. THE COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY, docket number 24-cv-09280, the parties participated in a status conference to discuss the progress and management of the litigation. The case involves an anonymous plaintiff, referred to as DOE, against The College of New Jersey. Details regarding the specific

Central District of California

The case titled United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members et al v. San Marino Re Investors, L.P. et al, docket number 25-cv-11125, was a civil action involving claims brought by the United African-Asian Abilities Club and its members against San Marino Re Investors, L.P. and other

District of Massachusetts

Donahoe v. Amazon Web Services, Inc., District of Massachusetts docket 25-cv-12467, includes a recent status report filing. This indicates active case management and updates on litigation progress. The parties and court remain engaged in overseeing case timelines and issues.

District of Massachusetts

USA v. Nuzzolilo et al, a criminal case in the District of Massachusetts docket 17-cr-40035, recorded mailing of a document copy. This procedural event suggests ongoing communication or notification in pretrial or discovery phases. The case remains active in criminal proceedings.

District of Massachusetts

Town of Groveland, Massachusetts v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corporation et al, docket 26-cv-11297 in the District of Massachusetts, shows a new counsel appearance. This procedural event may affect case strategy and proceedings by introducing new legal representation. The case remains in civil litigation

District of Massachusetts

In Hossfeld v. EverQuote, Inc., District of Massachusetts docket 26-cv-11440, defendants requested an extension to file their answer. This procedural motion indicates ongoing preparation or negotiations in the early litigation phase. The case remains at an initial stage with active defense engagement.

District of Massachusetts

Avila v. Neuro-Rehab Associates, Inc., District of Massachusetts docket 26-cv-10625, features a joint filing under Local Rule 16.1. This filing reflects early case management and planning efforts by the parties. The case is in preliminary stages with procedural steps to organize litigation underway.