Browse Cases

District of Columbia

The case United States of America v. Enlightened, Inc., docket number 24-mc-00120, involves legal proceedings initiated by the federal government against Enlightened, Inc. While the government has filed a status report indicating ongoing procedural developments, specific details regarding the claims, defenses, or

District of New Jersey

In the case 2:25-cv-17354 SEDGES v. BARBATO, the parties are actively engaged in litigation with ongoing procedural briefing related to a motion filed by one party and an opposition filed by the other. The most recent docket entry indicates that a reply brief has been submitted to address the opposition, suggesting

Eastern District of Texas

In the case 4:19-cv-00711 Carey et al v. Dallas Nephrology Associates, the plaintiffs filed a reply brief in response to the defendant's opposition to a motion, indicating active procedural litigation. Although specific factual details and the nature of the claims are not disclosed, the filing reflects ongoing

Southern District of New York

In the case Barrales et al v. Conopco, Inc., the plaintiffs initiated legal proceedings against Conopco, Inc. The specific allegations or claims made by the plaintiffs are not detailed in the available information. The case was assigned docket number 25-cv-10390, but the court overseeing the matter is not identified.

Southern District of New York

Nike, Inc. has filed a lawsuit against Lululemon USA Inc., initiating litigation under docket number 23-cv-00771. Although the precise claims have not been disclosed, the case involves active pretrial proceedings, including the submission of declarations supporting motions. The dispute likely centers on issues related

Central District of California

The case 2:24-cv-09795 Rina I Gonzalez v. Martin O'Malley centers on a dispute regarding the award of attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). The EAJA permits prevailing parties in certain civil actions against the government to recover reasonable attorney fees and expenses. In this matter, one

Central District of California

The case USA v. Sutton et al, docket number 15-cr-00407, involves criminal proceedings against multiple defendants prosecuted by the United States government. The matter is currently before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, indicating that the case has progressed beyond the trial court level and is now under appellate

Northern District of California

In the case 3:16-cv-07244 Siqueiros v. General Motors LLC, the plaintiff, Siqueiros, brought a lawsuit against General Motors LLC. The case involves ongoing litigation, with recent activity including the filing of a status report as documented in docket entry 739. While specific factual details and claims are not

Central District of California

In the case Federal Trade Commission v. Top Healthcare Options Insurance Agency Inc. et al, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) initiated legal action against Top Healthcare Options Insurance Agency and associated parties. The case involves allegations likely related to unfair or deceptive business practices, as is

Central District of California

In the case 1:26-cv-21047 De La Torre Pardo v. JTCW INVESTMENTS LLC, the court issued an order requiring the parties to submit a joint scheduling report. This procedural order is typically aimed at organizing the timeline and key deadlines for the litigation process, including discovery, motions, and trial dates. The

District of New Jersey

A text order was issued in Finley v. Bosch Health LLC in the District of New Jersey. The order reflects recent judicial activity but lacks details on substantive issues or claims. The case remains procedurally active without clear public updates on its status.

District of New Jersey

The District of New Jersey court issued an order on a motion to dismiss in Transel Elevator & Electric v. Crown Energy Services. The motion challenges the legal sufficiency of the plaintiff's claims, likely involving commercial or contractual disputes between businesses.

District of Delaware

Kamal filed objections in the civil case against Femtosense, Inc. in Delaware, signaling contested procedural or substantive issues. The objections reflect active litigation and dispute over motions or discovery. The case likely involves business or technology claims based on the defendant's profile.

District of Delaware

Loan Source Inc. filed a civil lawsuit against Newity LLC and others in the District of Delaware. The case is in early stages with no substantive activity or updates. The dispute likely involves commercial or contractual matters given the parties' business nature.

District of Columbia

American Petroleum Institute submitted supplemental authority in ongoing litigation in the District of Columbia. The filing adds new legal precedent or evidence to support the plaintiff's position. The case likely involves regulatory or industry-specific issues related to petroleum.

District of Columbia

The court entered a default judgment for the plaintiff in Yuen v. Municipalidad Metropolitana de Lima in the District of Columbia. Defendants failed to respond or appear, leading to a ruling in favor of the plaintiff on liability. Further proceedings may address damages or enforcement.

District of Columbia

Gelin v. United States of America is in initial stages following a partial filing fee payment. The case has just begun, and administrative processing is underway. No substantive information about the dispute is available from the docket.

District of Columbia

The court in Bell v. United States Park Police set new deadlines, reflecting active case management in this civil matter. The case appears to be in early or intermediate stages, focusing on scheduling rather than substantive rulings. Specific claims or issues remain unspecified.

District of Columbia

FiberLight, LLC secured an extension to complete discovery in its civil suit against Milani Construction, LLC in the District of Columbia. The case remains in the fact-finding phase, with parties requiring more time to gather evidence and conduct depositions. The dispute likely involves contractual or

District of Massachusetts

The District of Massachusetts court is reviewing a motion for reconsideration in Brandwein v. Kennedy. One party seeks to have the court revisit a prior ruling, which may alter the case's trajectory or timing. The underlying dispute details remain undisclosed.