Browse Cases

District of Columbia

The plaintiff Angeline seeks an extension of time to file a document in response to a motion filed by the defendant Mayorkas. The motion alleges that Angeline failed to meet the original deadline, prompting the request for additional time to comply with the court's procedural requirements.

Central District of California

The sealed document in Antwone Stokes v. Gonzalez et al raises confidentiality concerns and procedural questions about the handling of sensitive information in federal litigation.

Central District of California

This federal civil lawsuit (3:23-cv-02926) involves a group of defendants, including ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY and others, facing miscellaneous relief claims brought by plaintiff PINTO. The case summary indicates that the court has issued 139 pages of procedural orders and rulings related to the case.

Central District of California

The case resulted in a report and recommendation issued by the court, affecting Jose Martin Lumbi Altamirano and others involved in the Desert View Annex. The report likely outlines findings and recommendations regarding the case.

District of Columbia

In Hills v. Staples, the court issued an order in this civil litigation matter. The nature of the order is not detailed, but it reflects ongoing judicial management of the case. The dispute likely involves claims between the plaintiff and Staples, a commercial entity.

Central District of California

The court in ACA International v. Fulford ruled on a motion to amend pleadings or court orders, determining whether the requested modifications were permissible under procedural rules. This ruling underscores the court's authority to control amendments that can affect the litigation's course. Such decisions ensure

Central District of California

In the case of Steven Patterson v. UVA Health et al, the plaintiff Steven Patterson initiated litigation against UVA Health and other defendants. The docket entry referenced pertains to a procedural matter involving the extension of the deadline for the defendants to file their answer to the complaint. This extension

Elon Musk filed a trial brief opposing OpenAI defendants' motion to preclude evidence and seeking partial reconsideration. The filing was made on May 10, 2026, and included exhibits supporting the opposition.

An order and a pro se in forma pauperis application were served by mail on Rafaele Di Giulio Ramirez. The service was handled by the deputy clerk.

The court appointed Attorney Matthew T. Hidayat as counsel for the petitioner by minute order dated April 16, 2026. The clerk updated the docket to reflect his contact information and representation status.

Attorney Haddy Abouzeid was designated as counsel for the warden at California City Detention Facility. The designation replaced Attorney Lauren Black, who was terminated from the role.

The court granted the petitioner seven days to file an amended petition, a motion for preliminary injunctive relief or temporary restraining order, a notice of intent to proceed, or a request for a different schedule. The order was issued by Chief Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on May 7, 2026.

The clerk mailed court documents to Dailys Gonzalez Valdivia in Haltom City, Texas, as noted in a clerk's notice of delivery dated February 5, 2026. The mailing relates to docket number 6 in the case.

Public correspondence from Heikel Reicino Gomez was filed, including a deputy clerk's response attached. The filing relates to an order and notice of deficiency, with an amended habeas petition re-mailed to the petitioner.

A court docket entry was marked as disregarded due to the selection of an incorrect docket number. The modification was made on March 31, 2026, to correct the record.

The court issued a clerk's notice under Local Rule 73.1(b) informing parties that a magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil case. The notice requires all parties to consent in writing for the magistrate judge to handle trial and post-trial matters.

A copyright report was mailed to the Registrar in Washington DC on April 29, 2026. The filing confirms the submission of copyright documentation to the appropriate federal office.

Central District of California

In the litigation between Benjamin A. Brooks and the Illumination Foundation, a deficiency was identified in the filed documents (G-112A). This issue, docketed as 25-cv-08866, may require additional attention to ensure compliance and proper case progression.

Northern District of California

The defendant has requested leave to file a document in the Xin Anxin (Wuxi) Semiconductor Technology Co., Ltd. v. Capital Asset Exchange and Trading, LLC case. This motion, docketed as 25-cv-08830, seeks permission to submit additional paperwork, which could influence the case's progression and resolution.

Central District of California

The magistrate's complaint against Tremper-Aguilar has been dismissed, indicating the court found insufficient grounds to proceed with the case.