Browse Cases

Jared Lee Newman challenges the State of Texas, suggesting a criminal or appellate case. The lack of court and docket information limits understanding of the specific issues or procedural posture.

This matter involves the estate of Martha Miles versus the State of Texas, indicating probate or estate litigation. The dispute likely concerns estate administration or state claims against the estate. Court and docket information are missing.

The case concerns the interest of T.S., a child, against the State of Texas. This likely involves child welfare, custody, or juvenile proceedings. The absence of court and docket data restricts further detail on the legal issues or procedural posture.

Ex parte Rudy Garza petitions the State of Texas, indicating a post-conviction or habeas corpus proceeding. The case involves a challenge to a prior state action, likely in criminal context. No court or docket information is available.

Charlotte Spragins files suit involving Lunn and 34 cattle, suggesting a dispute related to livestock or property. The case likely addresses agricultural or property law issues. Court and docket details are unavailable, limiting further analysis.

Carla Bouvier brings a civil dispute against Doyce Elaine Thompson, Geray Williams, and Judy Shofu. The case likely involves multiple defendants in a non-criminal matter. Court and docket information are not provided, leaving the nature of the claims and relief sought unclear.

Aundra Dawayne Elbert Taylor contests a matter involving the State of Texas. The case likely pertains to criminal or appellate law. The absence of court and docket information limits the ability to specify the procedural posture or substantive claims involved.

Anthony Michael Kienlen challenges a decision by the State of Texas. The case likely involves criminal or appellate proceedings given the party names and typical state litigation context. The court and docket details are unavailable, limiting insight into the specific legal issues or outcome.

This case involves a procedural matter concerning the certificate of service by an attorney. The details of the dispute or underlying claims are not provided, and the court and docket information remain unknown. The focus appears to be on whether proper service protocols were followed in a prior filing or motion.

Central District of California

Heghine Asiryan v. David M. Radel et al is a civil lawsuit seeking to address alleged misconduct and seek damages. The case involves multiple defendants.

Central District of California

KeyBank, N.A. v. Joseph Keyshawn Johnson is a civil lawsuit seeking to resolve a dispute between the parties. The case involves financial matters and potential liability.

Central District of California

A civil lawsuit involving Luke Davis and others against Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings and others was scheduled for further proceedings. The case, filed in the Eastern District of Virginia, requires additional information to provide a full summary.

Central District of California

The United States prosecutes Wheeler and others for criminal violations, seeking a judgment on probation and supervised release.

Southern District of New York

Zayas Jr. files a reply memorandum in support of a motion in a federal civil case involving U.S. Bancorp.

Central District of California

The United States District Court dismissed the criminal case against defendant Naqvi. The dismissal was likely based on legal grounds or procedural issues identified during the case proceedings.

Central District of California

Viel-Medeiros v. Sunrise Credit Services, Inc. seeks an extension of time to file an answer, indicating that the original deadline may have been impractical or unmet. This motion is a common tactic to manage the timing of legal filings in civil litigation.

Central District of California

This case involves an order on motion for extension of time to file in a civil lawsuit. The order grants additional time for a party to file necessary documents or respond to legal actions, providing flexibility in the litigation process.

Central District of California

Barnes has notified the city of an address change in the Mt. Vernon case, identified by docket number 25-cv-09739. This administrative notice is routine and does not typically involve complex legal arguments, but it is an important update for the court to maintain accurate records.

Central District of California

Pright Technology Limited et al v. Plaude Inc. is a civil case with recent docket activity setting deadlines and hearings. This indicates active case management and progression toward resolution, possibly involving discovery or pretrial motions. The underlying dispute likely involves commercial or technology-related

Central District of California

In the Matter of Salvatore Colangelo appears to be a case involving an individual, potentially a probate, guardianship, or other personal matter given the title. No docket details are provided to clarify the nature of the proceedings.