Northern District of Illinois
The case, USA v. VALERIO, is a criminal matter with docket number 02-cr-00906. The current summary indicates that the case is at the hearing stage, with a focus on terminating hearings.
Explore the full federal litigation docket tracked by Juryvine. Our database covers filings across all 94 federal district courts, 13 circuit courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court — kept current from primary court records. Filter by case type, status, or court level to find the cases that matter to your practice.
44905 cases tracked · 44905 currently active
Showing 20 of 44905 matching cases
Northern District of Illinois
The case, USA v. VALERIO, is a criminal matter with docket number 02-cr-00906. The current summary indicates that the case is at the hearing stage, with a focus on terminating hearings.
Eastern District of Texas
USA v. Carrera et al is a criminal case with a notice issued, providing a summary of the case's status.
Northern District of California
The United States sought a seizure warrant for a Circle financial account, docket 26-mj-70525, as part of an investigation into violations of 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and related offenses. That statute authorizes civil forfeiture of proceeds traceable to specified unlawful activity. The court issued an order on a
Eastern District of Texas
Vkansee Technology Inc. et al v. OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., docket 25-cv-00634, is a civil dispute filed in 2025 involving technology companies. The court recently ruled on a motion to amend or correct a pleading, docket entry 34, which signals the case is in active early litigation. Vkansee is a
Eastern District of Texas
Mendoza v. Bechtel et al, docketed as 25-cv-08971, is a civil action against Bechtel — a major engineering and construction firm — and unnamed co-defendants. The court has issued an order on a motion to dismiss at docket entry 25, a pivotal ruling that determines whether the case proceeds.
Eastern District of Texas
This is a federal criminal case — United States v. Williams et al, docket 15-cr-20626 — filed in 2015. The case involves multiple defendants, as indicated by the '-3' suffix on the docket designation, which identifies Williams as the third named defendant. The most recent activity is a Notice filed at docket entry
Eastern District of Texas
This civil lawsuit, also filed in the United States District Court, involves Onyx Therapeutics, Inc. and Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC. The notice of service document indicates that the defendants have been formally notified of the legal action.
Northern District of California
Rozario et al v. Alongi et al is a civil matter currently in the process of terminating motions. The case involves multiple parties and likely centers on legal disputes requiring resolution. The termination of motions suggests that the parties are nearing a settlement or final disposition.
Eastern District of Texas
An extension of time is granted in a civil case involving Girotto et al. against Allen Edmonds Corporation et al. The extension aims to provide additional time for the parties to proceed with the litigation.
Northern District of Illinois
Harris v. Ghirardelli Chocolate Company is a civil case involving a stipulation and proposed order, indicating that the parties have reached some agreement on procedural or substantive matters. This may relate to discovery, scheduling, or settlement terms. The presence of a stipulation suggests cooperation between
Northern District of California
TVIQ LLC v. Freecast, Inc. involves setting deadlines and hearings, indicating active case management in a civil dispute. The parties likely contest intellectual property or contractual issues given the corporate nature of the parties.
Western District of Washington
In the case of Richard Paul Merrell v. Tapestry, Inc., the plaintiff has filed a lawsuit against the defendant company, Tapestry, Inc. The docket number for this case is 25-cv-02510. A notice of lodging has been filed, indicating that certain documents or evidence have been formally submitted to the court for review.
Western District of Washington
A summons was issued in USA v. Balda in the Western District of Washington, docket 26-po-05442. Issuance of summons marks the formal start of criminal proceedings against the defendant. This procedural step requires the defendant to appear in court to answer charges.
Western District of Washington
Hearings were scheduled in USA v. Clair in the Western District of Washington, docket 25-po-06476. Scheduling hearings indicates active criminal proceedings, possibly preliminary matters or trial preparation. The case involves the United States as the prosecuting party.
Western District of Washington
Counsel withdrew from Seethaler v. Wells Fargo Bank in the Western District of Washington, docket 25-cv-01740. Withdrawal of counsel can delay proceedings and require the party to secure new representation. This procedural development may affect case momentum and strategy.
District of Massachusetts
Blackwell v. Expungement Unit in the District of Massachusetts, docket 26-cv-12037, was assigned to a magistrate judge. The case likely involves civil rights or administrative law related to record expungement. Magistrate judge involvement supports efficient handling of procedural and discovery matters.
District of Massachusetts
A magistrate judge was assigned to Logistic Services International v. Noble Supply in the District of Massachusetts, docket 26-cv-12035. Magistrate judge assignment often aims to streamline pretrial matters and help settlement discussions in civil cases. This assignment indicates active case management.
Western District of Washington
The Western District of Washington set and reset deadlines in Schwartz v. USAA Casualty Insurance, docket 25-cv-05466. Adjusting deadlines reflects ongoing case management to accommodate discovery, motions, or settlement efforts. This procedural activity is typical in insurance dispute litigation.
District of Delaware
Becker et al filed a civil lawsuit against Nissan of North America in the District of Delaware, docket 25-cv-00845. The case involves multiple plaintiffs, suggesting a possible product liability or consumer protection dispute. No further docket activity is noted, indicating early stages of litigation.
Central District of California
A status report was filed in Tamayo v. City of Los Angeles, docket 23-cv-10615, in the Central District of California. Status reports update the court on case progress, pending motions, or settlement talks. This filing indicates ongoing activity and court oversight in this civil rights or municipal liability case.