Browse Cases

Southern District of New York

In the case 1:22-cv-09622 Avangrid Networks, Inc. et al v. Security Limits Inc., et al, the plaintiffs, Avangrid Networks, Inc. and affiliated parties, initiated litigation against Security Limits Inc. and other defendants. The case involves disputes likely related to business operations or contractual relationships

Southern District of New York

In the case titled Bishop v. Combex, Inc., docket number 1:25-cv-07518, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit against the defendant. The notice of voluntary dismissal indicates that the plaintiff chose to terminate the case without proceeding to trial or judgment. No further details about the underlying

Southern District of New York

In the case titled Piatetsky v. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey et al, docket number 24-cv-09136, the parties have filed a motion or request related to an extension of time. Specific details about the underlying dispute or claims are not provided in the available information. The case is currently

Southern District of New York

In the case 1:25-cv-06095 USA Masters Weightlifting Inc v. USA Weightlifting, Inc., the plaintiff, USA Masters Weightlifting Inc, has brought a legal action against USA Weightlifting, Inc. The matter involves a dispute between two organizations presumably related to weightlifting governance or operations. The docket

Southern District of New York

The case Villalva v. A Modo Nostro LLC et al, docket number 25-cv-10205, involves a dispute between the plaintiff, Villalva, and the defendants, A Modo Nostro LLC and others. The available document is a letter filed in the case, but specific details regarding the nature of the dispute or claims are not provided.

Southern District of New York

In the case 1:25-cv-09457 Molinas v. Biscuits & Bath Pet Services, LLC, the plaintiff Molinas has initiated legal action against the defendant, Biscuits & Bath Pet Services, LLC. The docket entry referenced pertains to a motion or request for an extension of time, indicating that one party sought additional time to

Southern District of New York

The case Norris v. Clintonville Cleaner Corporation et al, docket number 25-cv-08764, involves a civil dispute filed in an unspecified court. The available document is a Certificate of Service, indicating procedural progress in the case, such as the formal delivery of legal documents to involved parties. Specific

Southern District of New York

In the case 1:23-cv-07786 Loh Xiao Han et al v. Interexchange, Inc. et al, the plaintiffs have brought a legal action against Interexchange, Inc. and other defendants. The case appears to involve procedural correspondence, as indicated by the referenced letter filed on the docket. Specific factual or legal claims are

Central District of California

The case of USA v. Zimmerman, docket number 15-cr-00278, involved a motion concerning the return of property. The defendant sought the return of certain items seized during the investigation or prosecution of the criminal case. The court reviewed the motion to determine whether the property should be returned to the

Southern District of New York

In the case United States of America v. Pfizer Inc. et al, the government initiated legal action against Pfizer and associated parties, alleging violations that typically involve regulatory or statutory compliance issues. The docket number 18-cv-00870 indicates a federal civil case, though specific details of the

Central District of California

In the case of Melanie Middien v. John J. Gilligan et al, filed under docket number 24-cv-09872, the plaintiff Melanie Middien has initiated legal proceedings against John J. Gilligan and other defendants. The case details and court jurisdiction are not specified, but a response document has been filed as part of the

Central District of California

The case titled Kimberly Hudson-Bryant v. OCMBC Inc., docket number 24-cv-00067, involves a dispute between the plaintiff, Kimberly Hudson-Bryant, and the defendant, OCMBC Inc. The available information references a sealed declaration filed in support of the case, indicating that certain details are confidential and

Southern District of New York

The case titled Joseph Anthony Reyna v. Graham, docket number 25-cv-06777, is currently pending in an unspecified court. The available docket entry references a notice filed under the category 'Other,' but no further substantive details about the claims, parties, or procedural posture are provided. Due to the limited

Southern District of New York

The case 7:25-cv-10694 Plaza Home Mortgage, Inc. v. Bishop, Jr. et al involves a dispute between Plaza Home Mortgage, Inc. and the defendants identified as Bishop, Jr. and others. The filing referenced is a declaration submitted in support of the plaintiff's position, though it is not associated with a specific

Southern District of New York

The case 1:25-cv-09608 Reyna v. Combs involves a legal dispute between the plaintiff, Reyna, and the defendant, Combs. Specific details about the nature of the claims or the underlying facts are not provided in the available docket entry, which references a notice document filed in the case. Without additional

Southern District of New York

The case titled Hoid v. KNOP-2 News et al, docket number 25-cv-08851, appears to involve a notice filed in the matter, though specific details about the claims or parties' arguments are not provided in the available information. The case is pending in an unspecified court, and the docket entry referenced is a

Central District of California

In the case of Castillo v. A Place For Mom, Inc., docket number 24-cv-02672, the plaintiff brought a lawsuit against the defendant, A Place For Mom, Inc. While specific details of the claims are not provided, the case reached a stage where a jury verdict was proposed, indicating that the matter involved factual

Central District of California

In the case 2:24-cv-07779 Seedevice Inc. et al v. Korean Broadcasting System et al, the plaintiffs, Seedevice Inc. and others, have brought a legal action against the Korean Broadcasting System and additional defendants. The case involves a memorandum in opposition to a motion filed by one of the parties, indicating

Southern District of New York

In the case 1:24-cv-03631 BKNS Management LLC v. Frysta Management LLC, the parties are engaged in pretrial proceedings as indicated by the filing of a pretrial statement. The dispute involves two management companies, BKNS Management LLC and Frysta Management LLC, though specific details about the nature of their

Southern District of Florida

In the case 1:26-cv-22327 Sawyer v. Assistant Field Office Director et al, the plaintiff, Sawyer, filed a lawsuit against the Assistant Field Office Director and other defendants. The case involves a procedural response to an Order to Show Cause issued by the court, which typically requires a party to justify why a