Browse Cases

Central District of California

The case 2:19-cv-04227 Derrick Munzel Wright Jr v. Omar Covarrubias et al is a civil dispute involving plaintiff Derrick Munzel Wright Jr and multiple defendants, including Omar Covarrubias. The available information primarily concerns procedural aspects of the litigation, specifically motions related to setting or

Central District of California

In the case titled USA v. Swissi, the court addressed procedural matters related to setting or resetting deadlines and hearings. The case appears to involve criminal charges against the defendant, Swissi, as indicated by the docket number prefix 'cr.' specific details about the underlying allegations or substantive

Central District of California

The court addressed matters related to the disclosure of the Presentence Investigation Report (PSR) and the Plea and Sentencing Report in the case of USA v. Burdett. These reports are critical components in federal criminal proceedings, providing detailed background information on the defendant to assist the court in

Central District of California

The case Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust et al v. Union Paving Company, docket number 24-cv-10939, involves a civil dispute initiated by the Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust against Union Paving Company. While specific claims are not detailed, the matter centers on issues related to

Central District of California

In the case 2:24-cv-02191, Pulte Home Company, LLC has filed a lawsuit against HDI Global Specialty SE and other defendants. The litigation appears to involve disputes potentially related to insurance coverage or contractual obligations, given the parties involved—a home construction company and an insurance provider.

Central District of California

In the case 2:25-cv-03937 AEA Ribbon Mics Inc. v. Warm Audio LLC et al, AEA Ribbon Mics Inc. filed a civil lawsuit against Warm Audio LLC and other defendants. While specific claims are not detailed, the dispute likely involves issues common to audio equipment manufacturers, such as intellectual property rights or

Central District of California

In the case of Sylvia Chandra v. Prager University Foundation, the plaintiff, Sylvia Chandra, has filed a motion for reconsideration as reflected in docket entry 59. This motion requests the court to review or modify a prior ruling in the ongoing dispute between Chandra and the Prager University Foundation. While the

Central District of California

In the case 5:25-cv-03232 Andrew James Christiansen v. San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors et al, the plaintiff Andrew James Christiansen has initiated a lawsuit against the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors along with other defendants. The dispute involves contested issues that have led to active

Central District of California

In the case 2:24-cv-00879 Alec Karghaian v. Citibank, N.A. et al, the plaintiff Alec Karghaian has initiated legal proceedings against Citibank, N.A. and other defendants. The case involves a motion for leave to file a document, indicating procedural developments in the litigation. Specific details about the

Western District of Washington

In the case 8:24-cv-01832 QIAGEN GmbH v. Zymo Research Corporation, the parties are engaged in litigation involving a discovery hearing. The hearing focuses on disputes related to the exchange of evidence and information pertinent to the claims and defenses in the case. While specific details of the underlying dispute

Northern District of Illinois

In the case of Smith v. AFSCME Council 31, Local 3477, the plaintiff Smith has filed a motion to compel the defendant union to take certain actions or provide specific disclosures. While the exact nature of the dispute is not detailed, motions to compel generally involve disagreements over discovery, where one party

Northern District of California

This case involves an application by the United States for a search warrant targeting one parcel as part of an investigation into potential violations of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a), which pertains to the unlawful manufacture, distribution, or possession with intent to distribute controlled substances.

District of Massachusetts

Surgenex LLC v. Organogenesis Holdings Inc., docket number 1:26-mc-11486, is a legal dispute between two corporate entities. The case is currently sealed, and no specific details regarding the nature of the dispute, claims, defenses, or procedural posture are publicly available. Due to the lack of accessible

District of Delaware

Chow v. Canyon Bridge Capital Management, LLC et al, docket number 22-cv-00947, involves a dispute centered on the handling or processing of a credit card payment. The case has progressed beyond the initial trial phase and is currently at the appeal stage, where one party contests the lower court's decision. This

Central District of California

In the case 5:22-cv-01866 Catherine A. Blevins et al v. Synagro Technologies, Inc. et al, plaintiffs Catherine A. Blevins and others have initiated legal action against Synagro Technologies, Inc. and additional defendants. Although the specific claims and factual allegations are not detailed, the litigation involves

Central District of California

The case 8:22-cv-01790, Gail Parrish et al v. Gordon Lane Healthcare, LLC et al, involves plaintiffs Gail Parrish and additional parties initiating legal action against Gordon Lane Healthcare, LLC and other defendants. While precise allegations are not disclosed, the dispute likely centers on issues related to

Central District of California

The case of Anne-Marie DeHerrera v. Garden of Life, LLC, docket number 25-cv-03118, involves ongoing litigation between the plaintiff and the defendant. Although specific details about the underlying dispute are not disclosed, the case is currently in the procedural stage where motions and replies are being filed.

Central District of California

In the case 5:24-cv-02472 Nabil Mihoubi v. Riverside County Child Services DPSS et al, the plaintiff, Nabil Mihoubi, has initiated legal action against Riverside County Child Services and the Department of Public Social Services (DPSS). The lawsuit centers on allegations concerning the conduct or decisions made by

Central District of California

The Board of Trustees of the Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern California filed a lawsuit against MCEC, Inc. and other defendants, alleging violations related to pension fund contributions and labor agreements. As the plaintiff manages pension benefits for construction laborers, the dispute likely

Central District of California

In USA v. Rodriguez-Pena, the court considered whether the defendant should be detained pending further legal proceedings. The primary focus was on evaluating the risk factors such as potential flight risk and danger to the community.