Browse Cases

The Department of Justice charged over 25 members of the Tren de Aragua gang in a nationwide operation. Authorities seized 80 firearms linked to the gang's criminal activities across multiple states.

District of Colorado

The District of Colorado court held a status conference in the federal criminal cases USA v. Smith and USA v. Bowman (Docket 24-cr-00295). The conference addressed case progress, scheduling, discovery, and potential motions to prepare for trial or resolution. Specific details of the discussions were not disclosed. The

Brian T. Owen sued the warden of Federal Correctional Institution Pollock, alleging violations of inmate rights and improper treatment. The court analyzed the constitutional and statutory frameworks protecting prisoners. The opinion addressed qualified immunity for prison officials and the sufficiency of the

Joshua McKee sued MPW Industrial Services Inc. and Crane Company, alleging workplace injury and product liability claims. The court examined the responsibilities of employers and manufacturers in maintaining safe equipment and work environments. The opinion addressed causation, negligence, and strict liability

Andrew Welton sued the Virginia Department of Corrections, raising claims related to prison conditions and inmate rights. The court considered constitutional standards for treatment of prisoners and the adequacy of facility conditions. The opinion discussed the threshold for establishing violations and the defenses

Matthew Alexander Oneill filed suit against the Derby Police Department and Officer Landon, alleging civil rights violations and misconduct. The court reviewed the claims under federal statutes governing police conduct and excessive force. The opinion examined qualified immunity defenses and the factual basis for the

The Ramos Injury Firm LLC, doing business as Ramos Law, sued David Petrushka over alleged professional misconduct or contractual disputes. The court analyzed the claims related to legal services and the standards for proving breach or malpractice. The opinion discussed the evidentiary burden and the defenses raised by

Miguel A. Vazquez brought suit against SRS AOT, American Roofing, Luis Gonzalez, and Tracy Spence, alleging workplace injury and related claims. The court addressed issues of employer liability, workers' compensation, and potential third-party claims. The opinion examined the scope of employment and the applicability

Michael Lusk sued the City of Memphis, Wal-Mart Stores East LP, and Wal-Mart, alleging premises liability and related claims. The court evaluated the duty of care owed by property owners and occupiers to visitors. The opinion discussed the elements required to prove negligence in slip-and-fall or similar incidents on

Adrian Salazar filed claims against Londonburg Captain Denise Brewer and Nurse Melissa, alleging violations related to medical care or treatment. The court analyzed the standards for medical negligence and the duties owed by healthcare providers in custodial settings. The opinion addressed evidentiary requirements and

Supastar Ware brought suit against Jane Summer and others, alleging breach of contract and related claims. The court examined the contractual obligations and the parties' performance under the agreement. The ruling focused on interpreting contract terms and assessing whether the plaintiff met the burden to prove

El Haq Malak Bey sued St. Joseph County and other defendants. The case involves claims related to alleged misconduct or negligence by the county and its officials. The court addressed the sufficiency of the plaintiff's allegations and the applicable legal standards for government liability. The opinion clarifies the

Kenneth Browning filed a joint motion to extend time and modify the scheduling order. The motion seeks additional time for case deadlines, reflecting ongoing case management adjustments.

An errata was filed, correcting or clarifying prior filings or orders. The content and impact of the errata are not detailed in the docket entry.

An order was issued on a motion for extension of time and to set or reset deadlines. The order adjusts the litigation schedule to accommodate parties' needs or court requirements.

A superseding indictment was filed charging multiple defendants, including Stephawn Malik Watson, with various counts. The indictment lists specific counts assigned to each defendant, reflecting expanded or modified charges. This document supersedes prior indictments and sets the framework for prosecution.

The United States filed a status report concerning multiple defendants, including Stephawn Malik Watson. The report likely updates the court on case progress, investigations, or procedural matters. The filing was made by counsel for the government.

Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby granted a consent motion to exclude time for several defendants, including Stephawn Malik Watson, on September 8, 2023. The order excludes specific periods from the speedy trial calculation, impacting the timeline for trial commencement.

The case involving multiple defendants, including Stephawn Malik Watson, was reassigned to Judge Brendan Abell Hurson. Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby was removed from the case. The reassignment reflects a change in judicial management for this multi-defendant matter.

The United States filed a consent motion to exclude time for several defendants, including Stephawn Malik Watson. The motion included a proposed order and sought to exclude certain time periods from the speedy trial clock. This procedural move aims to accommodate case preparation or other delays.