Superseding INDICTMENT as to Michael Akame Ngwese Ay Makoge (1) count(s) 1s, 2s-14s, 35s, Dementrous Von Smith (2) count(s) 1s, 15s-18s, 36s, Nadine Mahoro Mwamikazi (3) count(s) 1s, 19s, 37s, Sky Tiffany Lawson (4) count(s) 1s, 20s, 38s, Christopher Thomas Yancy (5) count(s) 1s, 21s-24s, 39s, 46s, Sayquan Leon Bridges (6) count(s) 1s, 25s, 40s, Christian Malik Adrea (7) count(s) 1s, 26s-27s, 41s, Stephawn Malik Watson (8) count(s) 1s, 28s, 42s, Aiyanna Mone Washington (9) count(s) 1s, 29s-30s

The court filed a superseding indictment on May 12, 2026, charging eleven defendants with multiple counts.

The indictment targets Michael Akame Ngwese Ay Makoge, Dementrous Von Smith, Nadine Mahoro Mwamikazi, Sky Tiffany Lawson, Christopher Thomas Yancy, Sayquan Leon Bridges, Christian Malik Adrea, Stephawn Malik Watson, Aiyanna Mone Washington, Trez Anthony Hendy, and Tayonna Sonora Johnson.

The charges span a broad range of counts, with some defendants facing over a dozen counts each. The document revises and expands the original indictment, indicating a shift or intensification in the prosecution's case.

The superseding indictment assigns specific counts to each defendant. Michael Akame Ngwese Ay Makoge faces counts 1s, 2s through 14s, and 35s. Dementrous Von Smith is charged with counts 1s, 15s through 18s, and 36s.

Nadine Mahoro Mwamikazi and Sky Tiffany Lawson each face three counts, including count 1s and additional counts in the 19s and 20s range. Christopher Thomas Yancy faces multiple counts, including 1s, 21s through 24s, 39s, and 46s.

The remaining defendants face varying counts, reflecting the prosecution's tailored approach to each individual's alleged conduct.

The court has not yet assigned a judge to the case, and the docket number remains unknown. The indictment's filing signals active litigation but leaves many procedural details pending. The broad scope of charges and the number of defendants suggest a complex case, likely involving coordinated conduct or multiple related offenses.

The superseding indictment may reflect new evidence or a strategic recalibration by prosecutors.

The case stands at an early stage, with the indictment setting the framework for forthcoming motions, arraignments, and potential plea negotiations. Defense counsel will likely scrutinize the superseding indictment for overreach or procedural issues. The absence of a judge assignment and docket number suggests the court is still organizing case management.

The next steps will clarify how the court and parties plan to proceed amid the expanded charges.

Watch for the court's assignment of a judge and scheduling of initial hearings. Those events will mark the transition from indictment to active case management. Motions to dismiss or challenge the superseding indictment could follow, testing the prosecution's revised allegations.

The case's complexity and multiple defendants will demand careful coordination in the coming months.