Matthew Alexander Oneill Sues Derby Police Department for Civil Rights Violations
Case Summary
Matthew Alexander Oneill filed suit against the Derby Police Department and Officer Landon, alleging civil rights violations and misconduct. The court reviewed the claims under federal statutes governing police conduct and excessive force. The opinion examined qualified immunity defenses and the factual basis for the plaintiff's allegations. It also addressed procedural issues related to discovery and motions to dismiss.
Latest development
/opinion/10857406/matthew-alexander-oneill-v-derby-police-department-and-officer-landon/
Opinion · May 12, 2026
The court issued a written opinion.
Key Issues
- • civil rights
- • police misconduct
- • qualified immunity
- • excessive force
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Opinion issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
/opinion/10857406/matthew-alexander-oneill-v-derby-police-department-and-officer-landon/
Opinion · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a opinion dated May 12, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Matthew Alexander O'Neill sued the Derby Police Department and Officer Landon alleging violations of his civil rights. The complaint centers on claims that Officer Landon used excessive force during an encounter with O'Neill. The case remains active with no judge assigned yet and no public docket number available.
The court issued a written opinion on May 12, 2026, but details of that opinion have not been disclosed. The lack of a judge assignment suggests the case is still in early stages, possibly awaiting further procedural steps or a scheduling order.
The core dispute involves whether Officer Landon's conduct during the incident violated constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures or excessive force. O'Neill's claims likely invoke Section 1983, a common vehicle for civil rights lawsuits against police officers.
The Derby Police Department is named as a defendant, which could expose the municipality to liability if a policy or custom contributed to the alleged misconduct. The case's progression will hinge on discovery and potential motions to dismiss or for summary judgment.
The court's May 12 opinion may address preliminary issues such as jurisdiction, standing, or initial factual findings, but without the text, its impact remains unclear. This lawsuit fits into a broader pattern of civil rights litigation challenging police conduct in local departments.
The absence of a docket number or judge assignment limits public visibility into procedural developments. The next steps will clarify the legal and factual contours of O'Neill's claims and the defendants' defenses.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
/opinion/10857406/matthew-alexander-oneill-v-derby-police-department-and-officer-landon/
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 event/opinion/10857406/matthew-alexander-oneill-v-derby-police-department-and-officer-landon/
The court issued a written opinion.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
46 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.