civil-litigation court-opinion

Michael Lusk Alleges Premises Liability Against City of Memphis and Wal-Mart

Active Opinion issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Michael Lusk sued the City of Memphis, Wal-Mart Stores East LP, and Wal-Mart, alleging premises liability and related claims. The court evaluated the duty of care owed by property owners and occupiers to visitors. The opinion discussed the elements required to prove negligence in slip-and-fall or similar incidents on commercial property. It also reviewed the defendants' motions to dismiss and the sufficiency of the plaintiff's factual allegations.

Latest development

/opinion/10857409/michael-lusk-v-the-city-of-memphis-wal-mart-stores-east-lp-wal-mart/

Opinion · May 12, 2026

The court issued a written opinion.

Key Issues

  • premises liability
  • negligence
  • duty of care
  • motion to dismiss
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Opinion issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

/opinion/10857409/michael-lusk-v-the-city-of-memphis-wal-mart-stores-east-lp-wal-mart/

Opinion · May 12, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

Parties not parsed yet

0 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a opinion dated May 12, 2026.

Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 1 day, 1 hour ago

Michael Lusk sued the City of Memphis and Wal-Mart Stores East LP over injuries he claims to have suffered on Wal-Mart property. The case remains active with no judge assigned and no public docket number. The complaint centers on premises liability, alleging that Wal-Mart failed to maintain safe conditions, which led to Lusk's injury.

The City of Memphis is also named, suggesting possible claims related to municipal responsibility or oversight. The court issued a written opinion on May 12, 2026, but details of the ruling have not been disclosed publicly. The absence of a judge assignment and docket number indicates the case is in early stages or under seal.

The parties have not filed dispositive motions or reached settlement. The case raises questions about property owner duties and municipal liability in slip-and-fall or similar injury claims. The outcome could affect how large retailers and cities manage safety obligations.

Watch for the court’s assignment of a judge and any motions to dismiss or for summary judgment. Those filings will clarify the strength of Lusk’s claims and the defendants’ defenses.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
menu_book
Opinion 1 day ago
The court issued a written opinion.
receipt_long Source expand_more

/opinion/10857409/michael-lusk-v-the-city-of-memphis-wal-mart-stores-east-lp-wal-mart/

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
menu_book
Opinion May 12, 2026

/opinion/10857409/michael-lusk-v-the-city-of-memphis-wal-mart-stores-east-lp-wal-mart/

The court issued a written opinion.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

46 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.