Browse Cases

District of Massachusetts

A petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 was filed in the case of USA v. Scott et al. This filing in the District of Massachusetts suggests a challenge to the legality of a person's detention or confinement. The case is docketed as 26-mj-02763.

Northern District of California

The United States applied for an order for a pre-trial restraint and forfeiture (PRTT) for one account. This action is related to an investigation into alleged violations of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and other offenses. An order on a motion to seal has been issued in this matter.

District of Columbia

A notice of change of address was filed in the case of DOYLE et al v. LOVE UNITED TRANSPORT, INC. et al. This filing in the District of Columbia indicates a change in contact information for one of the parties. The case is docketed as 25-cv-04371.

Southern District of Florida

The court issued an order in the case of Sweet Additions Ingredient Processors, LLC v. Meelunie America, Inc. This order signifies a judicial decision or directive related to the ongoing litigation. The specific content of the order was not detailed in the provided summary.

Southern District of Florida

No specific filing information was provided for the case South River Warehouse, LLC v. CITY OF MIAMI. The case is active in the Southern District of Florida. Further details are needed to assess the current status or key developments.

Eastern District of Texas

A notice to the receiving district of criminal case transfer was filed by the United States concerning Pacheco-Ortuna et al. This document indicates the case is being moved between federal judicial districts. It is a standard administrative procedure for ongoing criminal matters.

Eastern District of Texas

The United States filed a notice to the receiving district regarding the criminal case transfer of Tompkins et al. This filing signals that the case is moving from one federal jurisdiction to another. It is a procedural step to ensure continuity of the prosecution.

Eastern District of Texas

The United States filed a sealed objection to the Presentence Investigation Report in the criminal case against Trotter and others. This objection challenges findings within the report, which is used to determine sentencing. The sealed nature indicates sensitive information is involved.

District of New Jersey

No specific filing information was provided for the case VITALE v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al. The case is active in the District of New Jersey. Additional details are required to understand the current stage of proceedings.

District of New Jersey

No specific filing information was provided for the case LUDWIG v. CALLIGARO, DPM et al. The case is currently active in the District of New Jersey. Further details are needed to assess the current status or key developments.

District of New Jersey

The court issued an order for 60-day administrative termination in the case of AMMANA v. AGELIX CONSULTING. This order typically means the case is being paused or administratively closed for a set period, often due to inactivity or pending external events. The parties will likely need to show cause to reopen or

District of Massachusetts

August Image, LLC requested and was granted an extension of time in its case against TechTarget, Inc. This filing indicates a delay in a scheduled deadline. The specific deadline and the reason for the extension were not detailed.

Northern District of California

Antoine and defendants Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and others submitted a stipulation and proposed order. A stipulation is an agreement between the parties on a particular matter. The proposed order suggests the parties are seeking the court's approval of their agreed-upon terms.

Northern District of California

The United States filed a case management statement in the criminal case against Gulley and others. This statement outlines the parties' agreement on procedural timelines and future actions. It helps the court manage the case's progression toward trial or resolution.

Northern District of California

MACOMB FOOT, ANKLE & WOUND CARE and other plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the D.C. Circuit. This action moves the case from the Northern District of California to the appellate court. The appeal challenges a prior decision made by the district court.

Northern District of California

De Resende Bueno Dos Santos voluntarily dismissed their case against Governor Kristi Noem and other defendants. This dismissal indicates the plaintiff has decided to withdraw their claims. The case is now closed based on the plaintiff's action.

Eastern District of Texas

Gilbert voluntarily dismissed the case against 1808 Holste Motorsports, LLC and other defendants. A voluntary dismissal means the plaintiff has chosen to end the lawsuit without prejudice, allowing them to refile later if they choose. This action resolves the current litigation initiated by Gilbert.

District of New Jersey

The court issued a notice of mailing in the case of Berkovits v. DeJoy. This action typically indicates that official documents or orders have been sent to the parties involved. The specific contents of the mailing were not detailed in the provided summary.

District of Massachusetts

An extension of time to file an answer has been granted in the case of Smith No. 100 v. May, Sr. et al. The case, docketed as 26-cv-30029 in the District of Massachusetts, is a civil action. This filing indicates a procedural adjustment to the litigation timeline.

District of New Jersey

No filing information is currently available for the case USA v. BANKS, docketed as 26-cr-00056 in the District of New Jersey. The case is a federal criminal matter. Further details regarding the proceedings or charges are not yet on record.