3:25-cv-06947 Ramirez Gonzalez et al v. Noem et al
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal ( 14
De Resende Bueno Dos Santos voluntarily dismissed their case against Governor Kristi Noem and other defendants. This dismissal indicates the plaintiff has decided to withdraw their claims. The case is now closed based on the plaintiff's action.
Latest development
Order · April 30, 2026
The court issued an order.
description View filingCourt
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:25-cv-06947 Ramirez Gonzalez et al v. Noem et al
Other · May 01, 2026
Coverage
9 articles
5 sources tracked
Participants
7 Plaintiffs
11 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 01, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes 1:25-cv-25022 Batista-Perez, 1:25-cv-14168 Coalition for Spiritual and Public Leadership, 1:25-cv-00306 REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION AND LEGAL SERVICES and others.
Press monitoring has found 9 related articles from 5 distinct sources.
De Resende Bueno Dos Santos v. Noem et al is an active civil matter in Northern District of California under docket 26-cv-60537.
The main identified plaintiff or petitioner is 0:26-cv-60537 De Resende Bueno Dos Santos, 1:25-cv-00306 REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION AND LEGAL SERVICES, and 1:25-cv-14168 Coalition for Spiritual and Public Leadership.
The case is currently organized around Current docket activity and next procedural step, Settlement posture and dismissal risk, School, university, and education-policy disputes, Agency action and administrative review.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 1, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Notice of Voluntary Dismissal was filed. On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a order: The court issued an order. On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court dismissed the case Dubos v. Noem et al due to lack of jurisdiction. This means the court does not have the authority to hear the case. The case was previously consolidated with De Resende Bueno Dos Santos v. Noem et al. On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The parties filed a joint stipulation.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
A Notice of Voluntary Dismissal was filed.
The court issued an order.
The court dismissed the case Dubos v. Noem et al due to lack of jurisdiction. This means the court does not have the authority to hear the case. The case was previously consolidated with De Resende Bueno Dos Santos v. Noem et al.
The parties filed a joint stipulation.
The court granted a motion to consolidate the case 1:25-cv-03758 LIU et al v. NOEM et al with De Resende Bueno Dos Santos v. Noem et al. This consolidation will allow the court to manage the cases more efficiently and potentially streamline the litigation process. The consolidation is significant because it will impact the overall direction and timeline of the case.
The parties filed a joint status report.
A Motion was filed.
A response was filed.
The court denied a motion in the case De Resende Bueno Dos Santos v. Noem et al, which is a lawsuit against South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem. The motion was not specified in the provided information. This denial means the lawsuit will continue.
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal ( 14
Administrative Order ( 10
Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction ( 10
Stipulation of Dismissal (aty) ( 8
Status Report ( 82
Order on motion to reset ( 47
Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer ( 10
Sources tracked
5 outlets · 9 articles
Timeline events
9 records on file
Last updated
8 hours, 2 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.